Donate SIGN UP

Answers

21 to 36 of 36rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Avatar Image
That's the problem with Twitface - it encourages any idiot with a keyboard and a nasty nature to splatter garbage all over the place in the mistaken belief that being on telly makes you immune to the libel laws. He's an idiot.
18:30 Thu 27th May 2021
ich Thats the Elephant in the room -I'm saying nothing :-)
I love the idea that she was having an affair
Why is that nasty?
Saying she was when she wasn’t.
That’s nasty
because a man is just about to shell out a shedload of money for tweeting that she was having an affair, when she wasn't.
??
why would you love the idea she was having an affair?
Never mind (sigh)

Anyway the DUP is a party in turmoil just now. Arlene didn’t stay to welcome Mr Poots last night ...
as i said a man is now facing penury perhaps for saying she was, i don't use twitter or FB, too easy to fall prey to saying untrue things.
He seems a rather dour individual.
Depends what you say and who you say then about.
Also, to be honest, who you are
Anyway, FB were banning people from saying SARS-2 leaked from a Wuhan lab until they changed their minds ;-)
freedom of speech is alive and well on the internet, lol....
oh, people onlysue if it is true.... yeah heard that before
Blunt was gonna sue over being a spy - a prospect that outraged Thatcher.
Gillian Taylforth - but there was naughtiness there ! In short the defence lawyer who is now dead knew there was a video that showed that she HAD done you know IT !! and arranged to have it delivered "a soudain" on the fifth day.... oo look judgie baby etc

and the judge and the plaintiff ( Taylforths counsel ) KNEW he was up to his usual dirty tricks !!!

god lucky no one reads this
Question Author
ich: "I love the idea that she was having an affair
Why is that nasty?" - well if you don't know you need to have a long hard look at yourself.
// Also, to be honest, who you are
Anyway, FB were banning people from saying SARS-2 leaked from a Wuhan lab until they changed their minds ;-)//

since we are here;
trump says - was scientific statement death, and it was dumped in the bin marked "presidential lu-lu and other svsolute crap".
The bin was vaaairy vaaairy full

and now here we are when a dement says it ( Biden not trump silly!) - BUT - everyone agree it is OPINION

there are no facts in support ( diana death theory - well if there were it wd show MI5 and the Dook were NOT involved )

but there are needed facts that are lacking

the intial cases were the fish market and NOT the lab.
There was no cover up - the doctor leaked the cases and then croaked. even his detention was played out on camera
then
and it reasonable to conclude that what happened then would have happened earlier if there had been an earlier outbreak

and since none of his occurred earlier we could conlude that was because it didnt happen earlier

wuhan lab escape? can we have some facts please

// - well if you don't know you need to have a long hard look at yourself.//

no adulterers in the cabinet - righto!

normal day on AB clearly
// Ich Thats the Elephant in the room -I'm saying nothing :-)//

saying nothing xc "there is an elephant in the room"
o god this has to be AB
“ Why is that nasty?" - well if you don't know you need to have a long hard look at yourself.”

Oh for gawd’s sake lighten up me old China
Which definitely did NOT leak that virus.
And just to remind everyone: Arlene Foster is monogamous. Definitely.
Unlike Iris Robinson of course. How we didn’t titter about her and the young postman at the time of course because that would bave been, like, narsty ...

21 to 36 of 36rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Expensive Tweet.....

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.