ChatterBank6 mins ago
Lets Do The Usual Dance................
61 Answers
Answers
Damn savage - should never see the light of day again!
15:05 Sun 27th Jun 2021
// and Allah, for instance tried to terrorise people into obedience,//
noop
Islamic law prohibits forced conversion, following the Quranic principle that there is "no compulsion in religion" (Quran 2:256)
christians are ahl el-kitab -- children of the book
but hey this is a TTT thread so anything goes.......7.......
noop
Islamic law prohibits forced conversion, following the Quranic principle that there is "no compulsion in religion" (Quran 2:256)
christians are ahl el-kitab -- children of the book
but hey this is a TTT thread so anything goes.......7.......
-- answer removed --
I'm unsure what the thrust of the OP actually is.
TTT has used it before.
I wonder if he imagines that anyone on here ever has or ever would defend such behaviour, and he thinks he will see it on this thread.
The fact is, as Pixie has pointed out, no-one has ever defended terrorism, and I can;t imagine that anyone ever would.
If that's what TTT is waiting for, I suggest he is waiting in vain.
TTT has used it before.
I wonder if he imagines that anyone on here ever has or ever would defend such behaviour, and he thinks he will see it on this thread.
The fact is, as Pixie has pointed out, no-one has ever defended terrorism, and I can;t imagine that anyone ever would.
If that's what TTT is waiting for, I suggest he is waiting in vain.
These isolated terrorist attacks (even nine-eleven etc.) - however motivated & however horrendous to the victims - are like a flea bite on an elephant's bum to the western world. Every effort should be made to combat radicalisation, monitor suspects, deal with their actions and make them suffer the consequences. Maybe they will realise the futility, maybe not. We can only hope.
davebro - // Maybe they will realise the futility, maybe not. //
I suggest not.
If murdering random innocent people is supposed to make the West behave in a different way than it has thus far, then clearly it is not working.
I doubt that message will be received though.
When you are dealing with people who kill people because it enhances their unfounded belief in the superiority of themselves, their beliefs, and the notion that this is the way to convince people of their rightness, they don;t see that they are not causing an iota of change.
They simply think that their message is not getting through, and that's carte blanche to carry on hammering it home.
I suggest not.
If murdering random innocent people is supposed to make the West behave in a different way than it has thus far, then clearly it is not working.
I doubt that message will be received though.
When you are dealing with people who kill people because it enhances their unfounded belief in the superiority of themselves, their beliefs, and the notion that this is the way to convince people of their rightness, they don;t see that they are not causing an iota of change.
They simply think that their message is not getting through, and that's carte blanche to carry on hammering it home.
naomi - // //I'm unsure what the thrust of the OP actually is.//
I think the thrust of the OP is the complacency with which acts of terrorism carried out by Islamic fundamentalists is regularly greeted with. //
If that is so - and it is only your interpretation - then maybe TTT should address that perceived complacency wherever it is that he finds it - which is clearly not on here.
I think the thrust of the OP is the complacency with which acts of terrorism carried out by Islamic fundamentalists is regularly greeted with. //
If that is so - and it is only your interpretation - then maybe TTT should address that perceived complacency wherever it is that he finds it - which is clearly not on here.
naomi - // AH, No, I didn't know that because you said complacency is 'clearly not here'. That, in my opinion, is grossly inaccurate. I think complacency emanating from a determined refusal to address the real issue is rife here. //
That is a matter of perception, on which I guess we must agree to differ.
That is a matter of perception, on which I guess we must agree to differ.