News4 mins ago
I’m Sure This Woman Is Wired Up Wrong
https:/ /news.s ky.com/ story/k atie-ho pkins-a ustrali a-order s-far-r ight-br itish-c ommenta tor-to- be-depo rted-af ter-app alling- behavio ur-whil e-in-qu arantin e-12358 885
Does she think she’s above everything and anything?
Does she think she’s above everything and anything?
Answers
Once you ended up with our convicts, now you end up with our imbeciles. Sorry Oz, we should've warned you.
08:35 Mon 19th Jul 2021
ymb, the facts are the same in the Sky report Bobbi linked to, and in The Sun
https:/ /www.th esun.co .uk/tva ndshowb iz/1562 7268/ka tie-hop kins-ax ed-aust ralias- big-bro ther/
https:/
'feisty' - my harris
She's a relentless self-publicist and self-opinionated wind-up merchant, with utter contempt for the lower class (her words) who trail along in her wake.
She has no actual beliefs, beyond a series of deliberately contrarian statements designed to generate column inches.
I suppose you could (at a pinch) have respect for her as a carefully cultivated "pantomime villain", but feisty - no way.
She's a relentless self-publicist and self-opinionated wind-up merchant, with utter contempt for the lower class (her words) who trail along in her wake.
She has no actual beliefs, beyond a series of deliberately contrarian statements designed to generate column inches.
I suppose you could (at a pinch) have respect for her as a carefully cultivated "pantomime villain", but feisty - no way.
Read this scholarly paper about her and the 'damage' that CBB did to her image and how she needed to go over the top with nastiness to repair said image.
https:/ /eprint s.mdx.a c.uk/27 875/1/K H_and_C BB-BLEA KLEY.pd f
This is not a woman with a shred of principle or any firmly held beliefs - just a very nasty piece of work determined on self-promotion no matter what the damage to anyone else.
https:/
This is not a woman with a shred of principle or any firmly held beliefs - just a very nasty piece of work determined on self-promotion no matter what the damage to anyone else.
dave, you may be missing a wider point here, about whether "firmly held beliefs" means anything. There was a book back in the 60s called Society of the Spectacle or something like that, which predicted that with the spread of mass media the "public face" that people show to the wider world would be more significant than the "private face" - "the sunny-dave nobody knows", that sort of thing - that people are assumed to have away behind closed doors.
I think that's proving prophetic. There are already Bafta awards for "constructed reality" programmes, a phrase that would have been meaningless 50 years ago
http:// awards. bafta.o rg/awar d/2021/ televis ion/rea lity-co nstruct ed-fact ual
and now (thank you!) I learn that there's a university thesis on Katie Hopkins. Moreover, mainstream media are happy to hire her on the basis of this "public face", though Australia's government it seems are not.
(Did you know their PM Morrison believes he is doing God's work?
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ austral ia-news /2021/a pr/26/s cott-mo rrison- tells-c hristia n-confe rence-h e-was-c alled-t o-do-go ds-work -as-pri me-mini ster )
Anyway, Hopkins is a prime example of someone who's succeeded in life as a purely public figure, validated by popular votes on reality TV and by academic study. God-botherers like Morrison may disapprove, but why should she change her ways? Her life so far has been extremely successful.
I think that's proving prophetic. There are already Bafta awards for "constructed reality" programmes, a phrase that would have been meaningless 50 years ago
http://
and now (thank you!) I learn that there's a university thesis on Katie Hopkins. Moreover, mainstream media are happy to hire her on the basis of this "public face", though Australia's government it seems are not.
(Did you know their PM Morrison believes he is doing God's work?
https:/
Anyway, Hopkins is a prime example of someone who's succeeded in life as a purely public figure, validated by popular votes on reality TV and by academic study. God-botherers like Morrison may disapprove, but why should she change her ways? Her life so far has been extremely successful.
Jno- //God-botherers like Morrison may disapprove, but why should she change her ways? Her life so far has been extremely successful.//
In this particular case that's totally irrelevant, both Hopkins' persona and Morrison's religious beliefs. She went to a foreign country, flouted their lockdown laws and boasted about it online. What did she think would happen? A friendly warning? Most countries would have acted exactly the same way. Deporting her was the correct, no, the only, response.
In this particular case that's totally irrelevant, both Hopkins' persona and Morrison's religious beliefs. She went to a foreign country, flouted their lockdown laws and boasted about it online. What did she think would happen? A friendly warning? Most countries would have acted exactly the same way. Deporting her was the correct, no, the only, response.
For the ‘crimes’ committed, the sentence seems a bit drastic. However, she is one of those people whose reputation precedes them - and we all know what happens when the baying, holier-than-thou get their hooks into them. They leave no stone unturned - and if they don’t find what they’re looking for under any particular stone, they sneak a product of their own fevered imagination in there anyway. Such is life.
Mozz, I was answering the OP about "wired up wrong". My broader answer was to suggest that she's wired up dead right for the way society is going.
As it happens, I may have missed something, but none of the reports I've read had said she's flouted lockdown laws, but rather that she claimed to have done so. If in fact she didn't then she's being deported for annoying people, which is doubtless legal in Australia but not necessarily admirable.
As it happens, I may have missed something, but none of the reports I've read had said she's flouted lockdown laws, but rather that she claimed to have done so. If in fact she didn't then she's being deported for annoying people, which is doubtless legal in Australia but not necessarily admirable.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.