It’s Christmas Eve! What Are We...
ChatterBank4 mins ago
Boris Acting Stupid Again
Johnson has once again refused to Isolate....(For ever I wish),,,after one of Boris's "Team Tour of Scotland"
Tested positive for Covid, although Boris had been seen standing shoulder to shoulder with the person and also both on the same RAF Voyager flight from Glasgow to Dundee Boris still refuses to Isolate.
Has Johnson got a Brain ?.
Tested positive for Covid, although Boris had been seen standing shoulder to shoulder with the person and also both on the same RAF Voyager flight from Glasgow to Dundee Boris still refuses to Isolate.
Has Johnson got a Brain ?.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by gulliver1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
"Of course he has a brain, which is why he has come to the conclusion that he did; that daily testing is more than sufficient."
That's fine but, "[t]he Downing Street spokesperson also refused to say if he had been tested since the positive case was discovered."
How can't he just have the tests to make sure he's okay?
That's fine but, "[t]he Downing Street spokesperson also refused to say if he had been tested since the positive case was discovered."
How can't he just have the tests to make sure he's okay?
In the early days of the pandemic Boris was pictured visiting hospitals, unmasked and shaking hands. Then he inevitably got it. He was very poorly. He modified his behaviour after that, wearing a mask in public, saying the right thing.
Once he was double jabbed he decided he was safe again. Then double jabbed Javid got Covid so the myth of invincibility was shattered.
Even if the possibility of the Prime Minister getting Covid for a second time is very remote, he should be setting an example.
Another case of the rules don’t apply to me because I am the Prime Minister.
Once he was double jabbed he decided he was safe again. Then double jabbed Javid got Covid so the myth of invincibility was shattered.
Even if the possibility of the Prime Minister getting Covid for a second time is very remote, he should be setting an example.
Another case of the rules don’t apply to me because I am the Prime Minister.
“ UK Covid cases have jumped from the beginning of the week (21,000) to the end of the week (31,000).”
Like I say, the ONS sponsored tests are not related to the daily stats for positive tests
Those figures have fluctuated.
The ONS study figures show an infection rate of 1 in 75 of the population, down from 1 in 65. Moreover they show a pronounced drop in infection rates among young people under 24.
These figures are not reliant on daily testing levels, so the absence of daily testing of school pupils is not relevant
Like I say, the ONS sponsored tests are not related to the daily stats for positive tests
Those figures have fluctuated.
The ONS study figures show an infection rate of 1 in 75 of the population, down from 1 in 65. Moreover they show a pronounced drop in infection rates among young people under 24.
These figures are not reliant on daily testing levels, so the absence of daily testing of school pupils is not relevant
// I joined it yesterday, Gulliver. Keep up!//
yeah foo gully, she conributed a few side splitting one liners - er - that is the word for him ( you, Gully) springs to mind as a gut - buster
who said
if Boris is acting stupid, reading this thread he's definitely not alone!
yup - good company - this is AB after all
yeah foo gully, she conributed a few side splitting one liners - er - that is the word for him ( you, Gully) springs to mind as a gut - buster
who said
if Boris is acting stupid, reading this thread he's definitely not alone!
yup - good company - this is AB after all
// Like I say, the ONS sponsored tests are not related to the daily stats for positive tests//
yup spot on
I am not sure why they are doing the 1 in 120 bit ( incidence - there is a time period involved) as they can be diffficult to interpret
r number is the exponent - - gtr than one: increases
less thn one: deecreases
Latest is that r is between 0.8 and 1.2 ( 50% tolerance)
but if numbers are falling then it HAS to be less than 1
The fluffy Beebsters dont understand it so they cant explain it to us.
I think they have been underestimating the r number ( milking it down) and so now it really is the low number they always said it was,
there is a cliff edge fall in cases and no real change 'detected' in the r number.
difficult concept I agree
yup spot on
I am not sure why they are doing the 1 in 120 bit ( incidence - there is a time period involved) as they can be diffficult to interpret
r number is the exponent - - gtr than one: increases
less thn one: deecreases
Latest is that r is between 0.8 and 1.2 ( 50% tolerance)
but if numbers are falling then it HAS to be less than 1
The fluffy Beebsters dont understand it so they cant explain it to us.
I think they have been underestimating the r number ( milking it down) and so now it really is the low number they always said it was,
there is a cliff edge fall in cases and no real change 'detected' in the r number.
difficult concept I agree
15.25 yesterday- side splitter warning
That’s one word for him, LCG. ;o)
that - - you gormless gully why I wrote - referring to this entry
she contributed a few side splitting one liners - er -
"that is the word for him" ( you, Gully) springs to mind as a gut - buster
because if we compare the words we find they are identical
you dyslexic old dog!
go back to church
That’s one word for him, LCG. ;o)
that - - you gormless gully why I wrote - referring to this entry
she contributed a few side splitting one liners - er -
"that is the word for him" ( you, Gully) springs to mind as a gut - buster
because if we compare the words we find they are identical
you dyslexic old dog!
go back to church
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.