ChatterBank6 mins ago
Andrew
I'm not making excuses for anything Andrew may/may not have done but why are the US courts pursuing him yet issue retrospective Diplomatic Immunity to a US citizen who reportedly killed a young Englishman when she was driving on the wrong side of the road?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by hessian. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Barsel - // He wasn't well advised when he did that interview, so perhaps he thinks it's a better idea to keep quiet. //
If he was advised that an interview was the way to clear his image, than the person advising him needs to be fired, if they have not already.
From my experience of Andrew in public, and in the media, I wouldn't trust him to walk my dog around the block.
For someone to imagine that he could handle an interview with a professional journalist who spends her professional time eviscerating politicians - a breed for whom thinking on their feet is a career prerequisite - is seriously out of touch with what is actually going on here.
Andrew's lawyers are absolutely terrified of the FBI getting him a room, where he can say anything beyond his name, with absolutely good reason.
But that is not required here - a simple statement from his legal team denying everything is all that's needed to keep things quiet, at least for now.
Any civil action must await the conclusion of any criminal investigation, so this civil case will be dormant for years - which is why a simple denial of its veracity remains such a strange and potentially damaging decision.
Staying silent makes Andrew look guilty, and when you are part of an organisation that relies on the goodwill of the people to the extent that the Royal Family does, that is not a sensible position in which to put yourself.
If he was advised that an interview was the way to clear his image, than the person advising him needs to be fired, if they have not already.
From my experience of Andrew in public, and in the media, I wouldn't trust him to walk my dog around the block.
For someone to imagine that he could handle an interview with a professional journalist who spends her professional time eviscerating politicians - a breed for whom thinking on their feet is a career prerequisite - is seriously out of touch with what is actually going on here.
Andrew's lawyers are absolutely terrified of the FBI getting him a room, where he can say anything beyond his name, with absolutely good reason.
But that is not required here - a simple statement from his legal team denying everything is all that's needed to keep things quiet, at least for now.
Any civil action must await the conclusion of any criminal investigation, so this civil case will be dormant for years - which is why a simple denial of its veracity remains such a strange and potentially damaging decision.
Staying silent makes Andrew look guilty, and when you are part of an organisation that relies on the goodwill of the people to the extent that the Royal Family does, that is not a sensible position in which to put yourself.
Apart from her royal majesty and Bigears and Wills,the rest of of the Royal Family can go and(stuff themselves)or(find a proper job).We need some kind of royal leadership in the UK,but once Her Beautiful Majesty goes to join her beloved Phil there has to be some kind of consensus regarding the minor royals
Prince Andrew seems like quite a dislikable bloke, but it’s more likely than not that this woman is not telling the truth about being forced to have sex with him, and that this is in fact a money play.
There will be absolutely zero evidence.
I know this will upset the sisterhood who believe the ‘victim’ should automatically be believed, but I don’t believe she was forced for a second.
There will be absolutely zero evidence.
I know this will upset the sisterhood who believe the ‘victim’ should automatically be believed, but I don’t believe she was forced for a second.
she isnt dead and he is Jiuffre isnt dead because I heard her squawking earlier and Harry Dunn is ( dead and silent)
honestly why do I feel compelled to answer this stuff ?
he nevva had diplo immunity - randy andy that is!
and she did - - - doo dah sacoolas
and it wasnt issued
she just had it
and it has to be retro because you dont indict someone for future crime
and he w( randy you know...) asnt driving when he erm yo know
kissed her ( jiuffre )
and apparently she ( jiuffre ) is saying Andie ( THE FROG- prince ) kissed other unknown eastern Europeans.
and if the mods want to delete this my entry on the grounds the so called facts are complete and utter crap please go ahead
I am a bad person for even reading the foregoing crip
honestly why do I feel compelled to answer this stuff ?
he nevva had diplo immunity - randy andy that is!
and she did - - - doo dah sacoolas
and it wasnt issued
she just had it
and it has to be retro because you dont indict someone for future crime
and he w( randy you know...) asnt driving when he erm yo know
kissed her ( jiuffre )
and apparently she ( jiuffre ) is saying Andie ( THE FROG- prince ) kissed other unknown eastern Europeans.
and if the mods want to delete this my entry on the grounds the so called facts are complete and utter crap please go ahead
I am a bad person for even reading the foregoing crip
Pp - posts are removed for contravening Site Rules, and that's all.
Posting unreadable drivel doesn't count.
Posting unreadable drivel doesn't count.
Latest Posts
ChatterBank7 mins ago
ChatterBank14 mins ago
Is There Any Good Reason Why This...
News16 mins ago
Isn't It Good To Hear That Another...
ChatterBank32 mins ago
