Barsel - // He wasn't well advised when he did that interview, so perhaps he thinks it's a better idea to keep quiet. //
If he was advised that an interview was the way to clear his image, than the person advising him needs to be fired, if they have not already.
From my experience of Andrew in public, and in the media, I wouldn't trust him to walk my dog around the block.
For someone to imagine that he could handle an interview with a professional journalist who spends her professional time eviscerating politicians - a breed for whom thinking on their feet is a career prerequisite - is seriously out of touch with what is actually going on here.
Andrew's lawyers are absolutely terrified of the FBI getting him a room, where he can say anything beyond his name, with absolutely good reason.
But that is not required here - a simple statement from his legal team denying everything is all that's needed to keep things quiet, at least for now.
Any civil action must await the conclusion of any criminal investigation, so this civil case will be dormant for years - which is why a simple denial of its veracity remains such a strange and potentially damaging decision.
Staying silent makes Andrew look guilty, and when you are part of an organisation that relies on the goodwill of the people to the extent that the Royal Family does, that is not a sensible position in which to put yourself.