Boris To Face Corruption Investigation.

[gulliver1]

The High Court is to decide whether the £48 Billion "Levelling up Fund" has been unlawfully given to areas to be of Political benefit to the Con Party. They just can't help having their fingers in the Tax payers till , can they.

[THECORBYLOON]

"Forty out of the first 45 schemes to be approved under the fund in March had at least one Conservative MP."

[margarettom]

That’s because a lot of the poorest areas have Tory MPs since the last election Corby.

[Gromit]

We shall have to wait and see how the high court rule.
Without seeing the evidence it is impossible to decide if the charge has merit or not.
Until their verdict, it is a bit pointless arguing the Government’s guilt or innocence.

[gulliver1]

12.03. Guilty . end of.

[Gromit]

Gulliver

Thanks for confirming you are pointless.

[gulliver1]

Robin Johnson , Robs the poor to help the rich .

[ynnafymmi]

Meanwhile up here in Scotland,£600,000 has went missing from the SNPs accounts.Also posted missing is Sturgeons(err)spouse.No-one has seen the eejit for ages.Probably down in England seeking refuge from her ladyship.

[youngmafbog]

Cant tell from the article, like Gromit says we shall have to wait for the evidence to be produced from both sides at Court.

Its a pity we are wasting tax payers money like this but things do need to be out in the open.

Perhaps the Tories should not bother with levelling up and just keep the funds down South. Easier to justify as that is where most is generated.

[bednobs]

isnt it the government's (of any flavour) job to decide how to distribute taxpayer's money? Isnt that the main reason we have a government?

[Peter Pedant]

Good very good idea that tthe politicians arent trusted and have to give account for their actions

after Cameron it is a hard hard lesson ( as in - - - dont they have enough? clearly they think not)

this is not corruption as we know it - - tarts boudoir at No 10 etc

and
They just can't help having their fingers in the Tax payers till , can they. - - - is classically a Labour failing

Tory failing - they are power mad and start wars.....
lesson for Kabul - innit?

[Spicerack]

Sort of, bednobs.
I suppose you shouldn't spend it all on people who voted for you or you'd like to vote for you in future.
Although I'm sure it's pretty standard.

[Peter Pedant]

// National Audit Office, (no) supporting information to explain why they had been chosen. ....The Public Accounts Committee had also said.... concerns of "political bias" .////
from the link - heavily edited for short attention span ABers

the two great audit bodies of parliament have already stuck their fingers in the Pie - - PAC dates from 1658 - whining here and minging there.....

This looks like a JR ? does anyone know
High court ( civil ) admin doesnt really do corruption

[Peter Pedant]

// Sort of, bednobs.//

yeah I was gonna say - when the decision is to divert lu-lu into their own bank accounts or to decorate a tarts boooodwar at No 10

then -- - no

[1ozzy]

But, but, but, Tora Tora Tora needs a link from you personally Gulliver.
Otherwise he won't know what you wish to "debate".

[gulliver1]

09.14 B/A . Perhaps TTT is unable to read .?

[webbo3]

Perhaps gulliver needs others to post links for him/her as they can't be bothered.

[Peter Pedant]

// But, but, but, Tora Tora Tora needs a link from you personally Gulliver. Otherwise he won't know what you wish to "debate".//

cn I proof read that to:
But, but, but, Tora Tora Tora needs a link from you personally Gulliver. Otherwise he won't know what you wish to "debate". end of !

[bednobs]

"Sort of, bednobs.
I suppose you shouldn't spend it all on people who voted for you or you'd like to vote for you in future ... "
Isnt that everyone in the entire country?

[bednobs]

well, everyone registered to vote

[Spicerack]

No.