Quizzes & Puzzles61 mins ago
Boris To Break Election Manifesto
Boris promised not to increase Income tax , vat, or National Insurance if you voted for him.
He has now changed his mind and is going to increase Nat ins . Coupled with a strong possibility of smashing the State Pension Triple Lock, while he's at it.
He has now changed his mind and is going to increase Nat ins . Coupled with a strong possibility of smashing the State Pension Triple Lock, while he's at it.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by gulliver1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.We have to pay this money back, I just fervently hope that everybody has to contribute and not just those (as Ashworth and Sturgeon have said in the past with tax rises) that it is not just those with the “broadest shoulders”.
Everybody has been affected, and therefore it follows that everybody pays.
Everybody has been affected, and therefore it follows that everybody pays.
When those manifesto promises were made there was no foreknowledge of Covid, things are different now, I think people would have accepted a rise in income tax just as well. We are in a radically different economic and social climate now, we need additional funding for health and social care and the money t red has been chopped up for firewood.
All this talk about the cap being unfair because people with more money or valuable property pay the same as everyone else is in my mind wrong. Those who worked harder, saved more, shouldn't have to pay for the rest who didn't and those who couldn't will be protected to some extent.. I am only sorry for the next generations who will still be paying for the Covid burden.
Now we also need to make it easier for the established and positively assessed care providers to build or redevelop more residential care and nursing homes, more supply will moderate prices through competition. Maybe priority for unused local authority land, and when new hospitals are considered factor in associated care facilities on site with possibly subsidised partnerships. Add in a better inspectorate as well, with real powers to deal with the poor providers.
All this talk about the cap being unfair because people with more money or valuable property pay the same as everyone else is in my mind wrong. Those who worked harder, saved more, shouldn't have to pay for the rest who didn't and those who couldn't will be protected to some extent.. I am only sorry for the next generations who will still be paying for the Covid burden.
Now we also need to make it easier for the established and positively assessed care providers to build or redevelop more residential care and nursing homes, more supply will moderate prices through competition. Maybe priority for unused local authority land, and when new hospitals are considered factor in associated care facilities on site with possibly subsidised partnerships. Add in a better inspectorate as well, with real powers to deal with the poor providers.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.