Donate SIGN UP

What Would Happen If A Car Was To Accidentally Run Over These Morons?

Avatar Image
ToraToraTora | 14:50 Mon 04th Oct 2021 | News
56 Answers
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-58777041
...you know, it's quite possible, as Anton Yelchin discovered with an automatic that you can leave it in D and get out! How sad would it be if they didn't get out of the way in time? Would that be a crime?

Answers

21 to 40 of 56rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Avatar Image
Not sure if it would be a crime but a lot of folk would cheer
14:51 Mon 04th Oct 2021
Ha ha ha . Priceless.
We'll see it in the news, ttt... which day are you going? :-)
Well if it was an accident then it would be just that. And someone would die or survive.
These people are a menace - to the cause as much as anything else, but I wouldn’t be cheering.
Their main spokesperson was on Sky earlier claiming they have no choice but to do what they do: which is a pathetic attempt to wriggle out of responsibility for their actions.
`You like to come across as a no-nonsense roughtie toughtie, TTT, but you're just another keyboard warrior. One who continually wets his pants.
False plates as well? Tut.

Is all this happening before or after you've machine gunned Extinction Rebellion?

Did someone burn your toast this morn?
Question Author
"Their main spokesperson was on Sky earlier claiming they have no choice but to do what they do" - not even insulate their own loft it seems! PMSL!
Question Author
"False plates as well? Tut. " - who mentioned false plates?
"You'd have trouble finding me..." Not really. Stale urine is a very strong smell. Soon sniff you out.
-- answer removed --
On every thread about them (bar this one which is really about you) I have said that their deplorable actions do their cause no good at all.

The fact that I do not wish to kill them does not indicate that they have my support.
ich - // Their main spokesperson was on Sky earlier claiming they have no choice but to do what they do: which is a pathetic attempt to wriggle out of responsibility for their actions. //

The genuinely believe that all standard forms of protest have gained no meaningful reaction from the government, so they are now forced into direct action in an effort to get their voice heard.

The resulting problem, which they fail to grasp, is that yes, their voice will be heard, but its message will be soundly vapourised by the righteous anger of the inconvenienced public.

That's the problem with obsession - by its very nature, it means you become desenitised to the effect of your actions designed to get your message heard, and think only of the message, not the result of your methods.
There was a clip on LBC where they wouldn't get out of the way even though a motorist was in tears because she couldn't follow her mother (who was in her 80s) in an ambulance which had passed through earlier.

Those images will turn just about everyone (including those who support their aims against them).

Their actions are turning decent people against them.

What would happen in TTT's fever dream? The driver would have to prove to the police that it was an accident. They would have to be at the front of the traffic queue or if a queue had not formed, the CPS would have to prove intent which they would be able to do if the SOC officers were not able to verify any tyre marks indicating swerving operations.

Another outcome is that many would hug themselves in joy that someone has been killed in the hope that it deters any more protests and then move on.
Question Author
ok so we are in the realm of the moron lovers! OK I accept your chioce, I hope they don't block an ambulance when someone you care about is in it. Can the old bill not be made to do their jobs and get these scumbags out of the road? Tool busy kneeling I suppose.
-- answer removed --
Question Author
once one did it we'd all do it, I'd happily go to jail in the circumstances describe above by Sp.
You aren't reading your replies carefully enough, I have not seen one that supports their actions or their methods - just people against purposely killing someone in the road.
Question Author
frankly I am amazed I've not been suspended - again!
Geeezzz...I now have an image of TTT as an over imaginative 15 year old. Nothing better to do than come up with idiotic death scenarios for the meanies...
Yes Tora. It would be a crime because it would not be an accident. This thread proves that it would be premeditated.

Give it a go. Two birds with one stone, it'll get rid of them, and you'll end up in the clink.
Question Author
mamy: "You aren't reading your replies carefully enough, I have not seen one that supports their actions or their methods - just people against purposely killing someone in the road. " - but the "protestors" are, fight fire with fire love!

21 to 40 of 56rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.