they should stop publishing the figures in my opinion it only confuses people like gromit. Covid is no 9 on the list of things that cause death, we don't report daily figure of the others do we?
It seems to include anyone has has died within 28 days of a positive covid test- no matter what the cause was.
Why is anyone even bothering to measure that?.
What are the percentage of deaths "from" covid, daily?
“ Thanks, gromit. But deaths "within 28 days of a positive test", honestly tells me nothing”
Well it should do, as it’s the same albeit imperfect yardstick that’s been used for months.
So when it goes up ( and it’s high even for a Tuesday) that means there probably are more deaths from the virus.
So it’s good to be aware of that.
If you want to have a pop at the government go ahead. On the other hand if you want to say it doesn’t matter, equally go ahead.
The trouble is we’re all in our camps now: one way or another
I did ask, Ich... what's the percentage. We now have 223 deaths in a day, not from covid, but within 28 days of a positive test, whatever the cause and I've given just one example.
Does anyone know the average of how many deaths per day, there "usually" are?
I just don't get why covid is the "only" unacceptable death now. While deliberate kidney failure, stopping chemo and killing cancer patients, knowingly.... is just an acceptable side-effect?
// gromit seems to think the no of cases is somehow relevant. //
Yes I do. The bigger the reservoir of people with covid, the more likely we are of getting a mutation that is harder to treat.
Quarter of a million a week with COvid a big number to ignore.
To paraphrase Humpty Dumpty “I make a figure mean what I want it to mean”That’s the government policy, it keeps us in the dark and therefore scared of our own shadows.Therefore when the next lockdown comes we will happily acquiesce.
The number of cases might be relevant.
But rather than just look at one set of figures it’s more helpful to look at trends
Same with the deaths: it’s an imperfect and unscientific method evidently but it’s the SAME method over time so all things being equal it does tell us something.
What it doesn’t do is argue the toss about whose fault it is: that’s our job :-)
I'm not convinced, gromit. Surely, the more vaccinated people that get it, the more likely of a mutation?
I understand what you're saying, ich- but all things "aren't" equal. We are getting to a point, where sadly, we will lose lots to flu. They shouldn't all come under covid, because of a previous test. It helps nobody by being dishonest.
I too think they should stop publishing numbers infected. If we subtract the number of deaths from the numbers infected we find that the recovery rate is enormous. This is something we’ve got to learn to live with. Daily scaremongering doesn’t help one iota.
Believe it or not, I've had a Google around gov sites- and can't seem to find overall recent daily death stats. They only give "covid". Anyone have any better info?