Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
When Charities Don't Want Charity
A group of rugby players who have been supporting a hospice been told that their attire is now unacceptable. Why? Because it might offend LGBT people. The chaps have chosen to support a different charity next year.
https:/ /www.wo rcester news.co .uk/new s/19657 416.st- richard s-warn- men-dre ssing-w omens-c lothes- fundrai ser-off ensive/
And the RNLI have axed an annual Yard of Ale contest for fear it may encourage binge drinking.
https:/ /www.de rbytele graph.c o.uk/ne ws/uk-w orld-ne ws/yard -ale-dr inking- banned- because -609343 7
What happened to fun?
https:/
And the RNLI have axed an annual Yard of Ale contest for fear it may encourage binge drinking.
https:/
What happened to fun?
Answers
There's bound to be someone at the hospice who would be offended by the word "stiff".
12:05 Sat 23rd Oct 2021
"Potentially offensive, might be offensive", statements made by hospice spokesperson, not, we have received complaints. They obviously seem more concerned about what might happen than continuing to receive what appears to be a good source of charity for their hospice, something they have been quite happy to receive over the past eighteen years. Another case of people being offended on behalf of other people who might be offended but probably aren't.
A bit of both I guess, bednobs. All 'Leo' and all drinkers.
I just wish people would learn again how to laugh at 'daft'. What a sad world we're creating with all this 'offended' nonsense. Downright miserable. I'm with Stephen Fry when he said :
“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so *** what."
I just wish people would learn again how to laugh at 'daft'. What a sad world we're creating with all this 'offended' nonsense. Downright miserable. I'm with Stephen Fry when he said :
“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so *** what."
I agree that such extremism is both ridiculous and rather sad.
The problem lies with the No-Win-No-Fee-Blame-And Claim brigade (whose sins are often unfairly blamed on Health And Safety but that's another story).
It only needs one "Offended Party" to persuade a Greedy Lawyer (plenty around) to take up their case and Bob's your Uncle - our Pathetic Judiciary will inevitably come down on the claimant's side and award draconian costs.
And that's no fun .
The problem lies with the No-Win-No-Fee-Blame-And Claim brigade (whose sins are often unfairly blamed on Health And Safety but that's another story).
It only needs one "Offended Party" to persuade a Greedy Lawyer (plenty around) to take up their case and Bob's your Uncle - our Pathetic Judiciary will inevitably come down on the claimant's side and award draconian costs.
And that's no fun .
It gets better ... the fruit cakes are now targeting the tea cakes.
https:/ /www.th escotti shsun.c o.uk/ne ws/scot tish-ne ws/7889 416/tun nocks-b oycott- calls-t ea-cake s-confe rence/
https:/
It's now ILLEGAL for a pub to organise (or to allow others to organise on its premises) a yard of ale competition.
[Licensing Act 2003, as amended by Schedule 4 of the Policing and Crime Act 2009 and subsequently by the Licensing Act 2003 (Mandatory Licensing Conditions) Order 2010].
One can hardly blame the RNLI for wanting to comply with the law!
[Licensing Act 2003, as amended by Schedule 4 of the Policing and Crime Act 2009 and subsequently by the Licensing Act 2003 (Mandatory Licensing Conditions) Order 2010].
One can hardly blame the RNLI for wanting to comply with the law!
//But the lifesaving charity has cancelled the yard of ale contest because it sent out the wrong message about drinking large quantities of alcohol near the water.
They also cited health and safety concerns about large crowds gathering in the road outside a pub for the event//
Perhaps some were ending up in the water and needing assistance?
They also cited health and safety concerns about large crowds gathering in the road outside a pub for the event//
Perhaps some were ending up in the water and needing assistance?
Re the Rugby Players, it's sad they've taken their fundraising elsewhere because they didn't get a photo published this year and sad that the Hospice felt it was right to withhold one.
At the very least another Charity will benefit in future and hopefully someone will tidy up all the noses that have been cut off to spite faces.
At the very least another Charity will benefit in future and hopefully someone will tidy up all the noses that have been cut off to spite faces.