//Then you should read the links in my post, NJ.//
I did, Zacs, and I can’t see anything about “…being swamped with immigrants.” The closest I can see the Indie article coming to that is this:
“Britain’s vote to leave the EU was the result of widespread anti-immigration sentiment,…”
Which is the result of a survey of opinions, not a fact.
The “Atlantic” article (which I believe was dated three days prior to the referendum) says this:
“It’s unclear if Brexit would actually reduce immigration to the U.K. About half of the migrants to Britain come from non-EU countries, and previous efforts to curb immigration have had limited success.”
Neither mentions Brexit preventing the UK “…being swamped by immigrants.”
But as I’ve said before, so what if the Leave campaign did give that impression? If voters are daft enough to believe what they hear from politicians then they must prepare to be disappointed. It was quite obvious that leaving the EU would have no influence on immigration by non-EU citizens (either legal or illegal) and quite why anybody should have believed that it would is bewildering.
The other aspect I find very troubling is that voters who did base their vote on their concern about excessive immigration (from whatever origin) are so vilified. The electorate is entitled to be concerned about immigration even if politicians seemingly are not. It has a huge effect on the country, which is currently struggling – and often failing - to properly provide many vital services for those already here. If that concern is mistakenly interpreted as racism then so be it, but the concern should not be swept aside.