.....apparently because the 3rd jab's effectiveness wears off after a few weeks.
should this be the first world's priority? or would it be better for them to concentrate on jabbing the 3rd world - from where potentially scary mutant variants are more likely to arise?
so according to politico's we should vaccinate the whole world
wow...big banking for pharma, is that part of the cure or a plaster erm dutch and dykes no pun intended, i think we just have to get used to, sadly the infirm will die.
Vaccinating the whole world with what looks like now 4 jabs? A huge undertaking taking god knows how long. Is it practical or even realistic? Maybe we will be forced to accept that yes, vulnerable people will die and there is no getting away from it.
As I explained on here a few weeks ago, my brother-in-law had to travel from Bridport to Dorchester (16 miles each way). Thinking it could not be any worse for his wife, he was wrong. She had to travel from Bridport to Exeter (40 miles each way). A friend of mine who lives in Fleet - a sizeable town in Hampshire - had to go to Basingstoke, 18 miles away. It seems that if you live outside of large towns or cities, it's a shambles.
why vaccinate countries with low to small cases? all the rampant cases in the world are all in countries with the most vaccinated, I cant see the point of dragging down countries that have escaped the totalitarian style reset that we seem to be keen on giving ourselves, they are living normal lives. They are getting omicron and a few days later they are going back to work, no drama.