ich -
As I posted -
// I think the families of those who lost loved ones in the conflict, or who came home with life-changing injuries, might well dispute your assessment of the war as a 'cakewalk' for anyone involved, from either side. //
To which you replied - // Most of the casualties occurred in the aftermath of the actual war, which was very short. As I say, it was very badly planned. //
Leaving aside the fact that, were Britain not involved by Blair, there would have been casualties, your apparent excusing of Blair's actions is that 'most casualties' occurred afterwards - as though that gives him a free pass for his part in the injuries and deaths.
As far as I am concerned, if one soldier came back with a grain of sand in his eye, that's an unacceptable injury sustained for no good reason right there.
So the rest is utterly unacceptable, and remains so forever, and I don't care if Tony Blair finds a cure for cancer, he has blood on his hands until the day he dies.