Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Oh Dear Sir Kier
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bobbisox1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Starmer lied for months about Rayner being at the beer and curry social, and only when it was proven she was there, he referred to his lies as “a genuine mistake”.
If people are prepared to believe it was a genuine mistake, I have some magic beans to sell them.
Starmer honourable? Don’t make me laugh.
If people are prepared to believe it was a genuine mistake, I have some magic beans to sell them.
Starmer honourable? Don’t make me laugh.
This is why (whatever Boris says or does) Labour will never win another general election.
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ comment isfree/ 2022/ma y/31/bo ris-joh nson-di shonest y-keir- starmer -labour -abando ned-ple dges?CM P=Share _Androi dApp_Ot her
Like cats in a sack.
https:/
Like cats in a sack.
Nom,
//Fatti, Why aren’t you answering my question? What’s good for one is good for the other. No?//
Lol! Maybe you need to ask the ministers, advisers and lackeys the same thing, all those who’ve resigned as a direct result of the PM’s misdeeds?
Starmer is yet to be accused of or investigated for lying to parliament. Imagine if there was a Gray-style report into his behaviour, only for him to interfere and interject with it a week or so before publication? He’d look as a guilty as, well, I’m sure even you can work out how it would look.
Starmer has pretty much done everything above board in regards to scrutiny by the press and I’m sure that many will press for Durham Constabulary to break precedent over their retrospective fines.
If they do, he’ll resign and it’ll be a non-story, just apply more pressure on the PM.
It always look better if you appear to be honest from the outset.
//Fatti, Why aren’t you answering my question? What’s good for one is good for the other. No?//
Lol! Maybe you need to ask the ministers, advisers and lackeys the same thing, all those who’ve resigned as a direct result of the PM’s misdeeds?
Starmer is yet to be accused of or investigated for lying to parliament. Imagine if there was a Gray-style report into his behaviour, only for him to interfere and interject with it a week or so before publication? He’d look as a guilty as, well, I’m sure even you can work out how it would look.
Starmer has pretty much done everything above board in regards to scrutiny by the press and I’m sure that many will press for Durham Constabulary to break precedent over their retrospective fines.
If they do, he’ll resign and it’ll be a non-story, just apply more pressure on the PM.
It always look better if you appear to be honest from the outset.