ChatterBank1 min ago
Abortion U.s
101 Answers
Two things I don't understand in regards to the overturning of Roe v Wade.
1. Is it not the case that women choosing to have an abortion can/could do so by taking pills available via the Internet?
2.Can criminalising those who carry out abortions, doctors etc, be anything but pointless when a need for abortions will inevitably be fulfilled by back streets practitioners causing more deaths and adverse health outcomes?
1. Is it not the case that women choosing to have an abortion can/could do so by taking pills available via the Internet?
2.Can criminalising those who carry out abortions, doctors etc, be anything but pointless when a need for abortions will inevitably be fulfilled by back streets practitioners causing more deaths and adverse health outcomes?
Answers
Well pardon me but the idea that the majority of women use abortion as a means of contraceptio n is beyond ridiculous. Abortion isn’t nice. Best way to combat is not to try to ban it. It won’t work
20:49 Fri 24th Jun 2022
-- answer removed --
i find it very odd. apparently the right to bear arms is enshrined in the constitution and couldnt possibly be changed, however, this bit of the constitution can be.
In all honesty i see the american authorities as little better than the taliban in telling women what to do and being religious zealots
In all honesty i see the american authorities as little better than the taliban in telling women what to do and being religious zealots