News1 min ago
Yet Another Shooting In Usa. When Will They Learn ?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I think I'm with ttt on this. I'm not even sure why it's on the news (other than local to where it happened).
We could probably have a summary at the end of each year, number of people killed in USA mass shootings, with the story and discussion point being whether it was up or down on the previous year, and that would be enough.
We could probably have a summary at the end of each year, number of people killed in USA mass shootings, with the story and discussion point being whether it was up or down on the previous year, and that would be enough.
where is that idiot who always comes up with
"take your partner for the usual day-ance?"
young crazy with a high powered rifle - they do an awful lot of damage and dont have to hit you to rip your arm off - winging will suffice
Is someone really suggesting it is not news as it didnt happen in London ? Normal day on AB then
"take your partner for the usual day-ance?"
young crazy with a high powered rifle - they do an awful lot of damage and dont have to hit you to rip your arm off - winging will suffice
Is someone really suggesting it is not news as it didnt happen in London ? Normal day on AB then
david small - // Musing to myself…..I wonder if when captured they were publicly executed in a most horrific way. Would that deter such evil actions in the future? //
No, for one very simple reason.
No-one who commits a criminal act, from scrumping an apple to massacring several dozen innocents with a high-powered rifle, does so with the notion of consequences in their mind at the time.
If anyone thought about consequences, they would not commit the crime in the first place, but crimes are not committed by people who rationalise and consider the results of their actions - that's what makes them criminals in the first place.
Your solution would require the consequences to be registered and remembered by the potential gun nut, and to be forefront in his mind when he pulls the trigger, or rather does not pull the trigger.
That requires rational thought processes to be at work, and let's face it people who carry guns in public are, by definition, devoid of anything approaching rationality.
No, for one very simple reason.
No-one who commits a criminal act, from scrumping an apple to massacring several dozen innocents with a high-powered rifle, does so with the notion of consequences in their mind at the time.
If anyone thought about consequences, they would not commit the crime in the first place, but crimes are not committed by people who rationalise and consider the results of their actions - that's what makes them criminals in the first place.
Your solution would require the consequences to be registered and remembered by the potential gun nut, and to be forefront in his mind when he pulls the trigger, or rather does not pull the trigger.
That requires rational thought processes to be at work, and let's face it people who carry guns in public are, by definition, devoid of anything approaching rationality.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.