Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Rushi Sunak And Wife Taxes
The following has just appeared on my Facebook page - (tried to get it to show a link but not been possible). How much truth is in the story??
So... it now comes to light that Rishi Sunak's wife was part owner of Lava Mayfair Club Ltd (a private membership gym), which collapsed last year owing almost £44million to creditors, including £374,000 to HMRC!
Another of Mrs Sunak's ventures... Mrs Wordsmith (an education business) went into administration last year owing £16.3million – after receiving a £1.3million loan from the Government's "Future Fund"!
OH IT GETS WORSE... Digme Fitness (which she owns 100% of) received up to £635,000 of furlough money... before it then closed its eight studios in London and Oxford... still owing HMRC £415,000!
So .... Mr Sunak introduces the furlough scheme ... and the woman he's sleeping with benefits by up to £635,000!
Mr Sunak oversees the rules regarding Non-Dom status ... and the woman he's sleeping with benefits by over £20 million!
Mr Sunak is in charge of ensuring that the UK maximises its tax revenue... yet the woman he's sleeping with has been active in, or has owned, companies going bust owing a staggering £789,000 to HMRC!
Mr Sunak says his wife's tax affairs are none of OUR business... he can *** RIGHT off!!
Arrogance in almost immeasurable amounts!
So... it now comes to light that Rishi Sunak's wife was part owner of Lava Mayfair Club Ltd (a private membership gym), which collapsed last year owing almost £44million to creditors, including £374,000 to HMRC!
Another of Mrs Sunak's ventures... Mrs Wordsmith (an education business) went into administration last year owing £16.3million – after receiving a £1.3million loan from the Government's "Future Fund"!
OH IT GETS WORSE... Digme Fitness (which she owns 100% of) received up to £635,000 of furlough money... before it then closed its eight studios in London and Oxford... still owing HMRC £415,000!
So .... Mr Sunak introduces the furlough scheme ... and the woman he's sleeping with benefits by up to £635,000!
Mr Sunak oversees the rules regarding Non-Dom status ... and the woman he's sleeping with benefits by over £20 million!
Mr Sunak is in charge of ensuring that the UK maximises its tax revenue... yet the woman he's sleeping with has been active in, or has owned, companies going bust owing a staggering £789,000 to HMRC!
Mr Sunak says his wife's tax affairs are none of OUR business... he can *** RIGHT off!!
Arrogance in almost immeasurable amounts!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by evadora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
"The fact that her non dom status meant she avoided £20 million is also common knowledge."
So what?
If she's legitimately avoided paying tax, then that's a good thing.
People should only pay what they're legally obliged to pay - in fact, I'd go as far as to say everybody has a moral responsibility to avoid as much tax as possible as they are in a far better position to spend their money than any Government of any hue.
I'd be surprised if anybody would willingly pay £100 tax if all they are legally required to pay is £50.
Having an ISA is legitimately avoiding tax.
So what?
If she's legitimately avoided paying tax, then that's a good thing.
People should only pay what they're legally obliged to pay - in fact, I'd go as far as to say everybody has a moral responsibility to avoid as much tax as possible as they are in a far better position to spend their money than any Government of any hue.
I'd be surprised if anybody would willingly pay £100 tax if all they are legally required to pay is £50.
Having an ISA is legitimately avoiding tax.
Deskdiary
//"The fact that her non dom status meant she avoided £20 million is also common knowledge."
So what?
If she's legitimately avoided paying tax, then that's a good thing.
People should only pay what they're legally obliged to pay - in fact, I'd go as far as to say everybody has a moral responsibility to avoid as much tax as possible as they are in a far better position to spend their money than any Government of any hue//
Lol, pathetic. I’d say multi billionaires have a moral responsibility to pay what they ought to in whatever country they’re in residence.
How much money do you reasonably need in one finite lifetime?
//"The fact that her non dom status meant she avoided £20 million is also common knowledge."
So what?
If she's legitimately avoided paying tax, then that's a good thing.
People should only pay what they're legally obliged to pay - in fact, I'd go as far as to say everybody has a moral responsibility to avoid as much tax as possible as they are in a far better position to spend their money than any Government of any hue//
Lol, pathetic. I’d say multi billionaires have a moral responsibility to pay what they ought to in whatever country they’re in residence.
How much money do you reasonably need in one finite lifetime?
Can you not differentiate what is true, what may be true, what is alleged, what may be political posturing, what may be partially true, what may be inadvertently reported, what may be a deliberate lie, what, perhaps, may be a lie for the right reasons...Staggered that people people in black and white.
Deskdiary
//Nonsense Fatticusinch; morals don’t come into it.
If she’s paid all she’s legally required to pay, then she’s done nothing, ergo it’s not immoral.//
You were the one who brought up and mentioned morals.
Morally you’d reason that a multi-billionaire, married to the Chancellor and languishing in all the trappings of living in a western society might feel that £20 million is a drop in the ocean and ‘chickenfeed’ in the midst of a cost of living crisis, in comparison to the billions she’s heiress to, an amount she could never spend in 100 lifetimes.
As you brought them up, I’d say it’s morally reprehensible and makes one look greedy and devious.
Wonder where she got that mindset from?
//Nonsense Fatticusinch; morals don’t come into it.
If she’s paid all she’s legally required to pay, then she’s done nothing, ergo it’s not immoral.//
You were the one who brought up and mentioned morals.
Morally you’d reason that a multi-billionaire, married to the Chancellor and languishing in all the trappings of living in a western society might feel that £20 million is a drop in the ocean and ‘chickenfeed’ in the midst of a cost of living crisis, in comparison to the billions she’s heiress to, an amount she could never spend in 100 lifetimes.
As you brought them up, I’d say it’s morally reprehensible and makes one look greedy and devious.
Wonder where she got that mindset from?
Latest Posts
Quizzes & Puzzles5 mins ago
Listener 4842 For Me And You By...
Crosswords14 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles25 mins ago
Trump/Ukraine, What Will He Do?
News25 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.