News1 min ago
Ooops, More Brexit Costs Exposed.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Best strategy is to play for time and keep postponing payments using "technicalities". They understand that game. With a fair wind the ponzi scheme wil collapse before we pay a penny. After all our money will only prop up the scam for a little longer anyway. It is on the verge of imploding as it is.
As someone who was initially in favour of Brexit I’m still waiting to see the benefits of if there we were promised.
Meanwhile….
https:/ /news.s ky.com/ story/h olidaym akers-s tuck-in -long-q ueues-a s-port- of-dove r-criti cal-inc ident-d eclared -126567 08
Meanwhile….
https:/
"well if it's inflation why are we paying more? Tell them to go forth and multiply."
As it appears the UK is obliged to take into account the rate of inflation when paying its contributions, they will increase or decrease as inflation rises and falls.
The contributions are paid in euros, so again, the amount paid in sterling will change as the exchange rate fluctuates.
As it appears the UK is obliged to take into account the rate of inflation when paying its contributions, they will increase or decrease as inflation rises and falls.
The contributions are paid in euros, so again, the amount paid in sterling will change as the exchange rate fluctuates.
If Brexit is such a great success and should be celebrated, as some urge on here, why did the Government wait until the recess to divulge this news?
Why wasn’t it relayed to the grateful public as soon as the Treasury worked out the figures, but instead held over until MPs were on their break?
The delay obviously came from our lame duck Prime Minister, who didn’t want his big achievement scrutinised in parliament on his last week at work.
Why wasn’t it relayed to the grateful public as soon as the Treasury worked out the figures, but instead held over until MPs were on their break?
The delay obviously came from our lame duck Prime Minister, who didn’t want his big achievement scrutinised in parliament on his last week at work.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.