I see parallels between Harry, Andrew, and Edward VII.
All are, or were, academically dim, self-obsessed, thin-skinned, over-entitled bores who were far too convinced of their own innate fabulousness, and would accept nothing less than their word being the only word.
It's possible to add the ruinous effect of their mutual wives, who instead of doing what wives the world over do, when men get silly and above themselves, which is. laugh and bring them back to earth sharpish, the three ladies have indulged their husbands' appalling arrogance and dreadful behaviour, convincing them even more how wonderfully correct they are in a world where everyone else is wrong.
Now the Queen loves her family, and the monarchy, and may see this as a chance to mend some bridges before she hands over to Charles, and that is entirely commensurate with her roles as the matriarch of the family, and the monarch of the nation.
I wish her well, although i fear that Harry is a lost cause because he either has bad advice, and pays too much attention to it, or good advice which he ignores.
The ends result is a young man of great wealth and entitlement who seems hell-bent on trying to convince the world how poorly done-to he is, with resounding failure.
I doubt he will swallow his pride and his arrogance and listen to someone who has forgotten more wisdom and experience than he would know in a dozen lifetimes.
We can hope ...