Attempted Robbery In Cape Town
ChatterBank0 min ago
Gender Skeletons
not enough to have a go at the living, even the dead are not exempt...
https:/
https:/
Answers
1 to 8 of 8
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by fender62. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Human skeletons have distinctive differences according to their biological sex and it is also possible to determine a broad outline of the deceased's race. Gender is now a largely meaningless term, mainly determined by an individual's opinion. Since human remains have no opinion, assigning a gender is inappropriate and it's best to stick to biological sex. Similarly, race (at least as far as can be determined by a skeleton) is a matter of fact. Unfortunately those with a "woke" agenda frequently want to deny or at least refuse to accept fact, preferring instead to encourage or bully others into accepting various fictions. This seems to be part of that agenda.
they have a point: recently a Viking skeleton, buried with weapons and warhorses and so forth, turned out to be female.
https:/
Likewise a pair of hand-holding "lovers" turned out to be both male
https:/
Archaeologists can let their prejudices get in the way of facts. This isn't to say sex should be ignored; what's needed is more science, not less.
https:/
Likewise a pair of hand-holding "lovers" turned out to be both male
https:/
Archaeologists can let their prejudices get in the way of facts. This isn't to say sex should be ignored; what's needed is more science, not less.
1 to 8 of 8
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.