Quizzes & Puzzles11 mins ago
Rwanda Scheme Does Deter People Comming To Britain.......
93 Answers
Not my view, that of Iraqi people smugglers.....
https:/ /news.s ky.com/ story/r wanda-p olicy-c ould-de ter-mig rants-h eading- to-the- uk-peop le-smug glers-a dmit-12 658288
Watch the interview.
https:/
Watch the interview.
Answers
The chances of any migrant being removed is absolutely minimal because it ain't running yet. Some virtue signalling fools are putting obstacles in the way. That needs sorting first. Yes there is nothing to prevent the illegals repeating the process of paying a fortune to return and then getting sent to Rwanda again; but being removed once is likely to sap...
11:44 Tue 26th Jul 2022
The chances of any migrant being removed is absolutely minimal because it ain't running yet. Some virtue signalling fools are putting obstacles in the way. That needs sorting first. Yes there is nothing to prevent the illegals repeating the process of paying a fortune to return and then getting sent to Rwanda again; but being removed once is likely to sap enthusiasm for that.
> Couldn't we make our benefits and our healthcare slower to access, bringing them into line with other countries?
>> No, because the handwringers (including many in the so-called Tory Party) won’t hear of it.
>> Don’t get me wrong, the Rwanda plan is a farce. If (a very big “if”) any are sent there the numbers will barely scratch the surface of the problem.
Again, it doesn't stack up. The handwringers can't be persuaded on making access to healthcare and benefits as difficult as on the continent, but the Rwanda scheme can be got past the same handwringers - as if it was somehow less onerous?
And then the Rwanda scheme is a farce, so what's actually being done is ... nothing???
Do the handwringers know that the Rwanda scheme is a farce so, as long as it remains a farce, they pay lip service to it?
Is this what politics has become?
>> No, because the handwringers (including many in the so-called Tory Party) won’t hear of it.
>> Don’t get me wrong, the Rwanda plan is a farce. If (a very big “if”) any are sent there the numbers will barely scratch the surface of the problem.
Again, it doesn't stack up. The handwringers can't be persuaded on making access to healthcare and benefits as difficult as on the continent, but the Rwanda scheme can be got past the same handwringers - as if it was somehow less onerous?
And then the Rwanda scheme is a farce, so what's actually being done is ... nothing???
Do the handwringers know that the Rwanda scheme is a farce so, as long as it remains a farce, they pay lip service to it?
Is this what politics has become?
No I am not.
Australia has a real world offshoring scheme that has run for a number of years. Their costs per migrant are documented (unlike ours which have not been divulged).
We will not get economy of scale because Rwanda only has 200 places. The initial costs are not one off set up costs, they are the costs ongoing.
Australia has a real world offshoring scheme that has run for a number of years. Their costs per migrant are documented (unlike ours which have not been divulged).
We will not get economy of scale because Rwanda only has 200 places. The initial costs are not one off set up costs, they are the costs ongoing.
“Show me who makes a profit from war, and I’ll show you how to stop the war.”
— Henry Ford
This applies to many other things too, including the illegal immigrant problem. See my post above at 11:21 - the government is giving millions to charities like Migrant Help, a lot of people are getting very rich and don't want it to ever stop.
Just imagine the Home Office paying a £1,000 mooring fee for a seized boat that 'imported a number of migrants into Rye Harbour'.
Who charged that sum? - we should be told.
— Henry Ford
This applies to many other things too, including the illegal immigrant problem. See my post above at 11:21 - the government is giving millions to charities like Migrant Help, a lot of people are getting very rich and don't want it to ever stop.
Just imagine the Home Office paying a £1,000 mooring fee for a seized boat that 'imported a number of migrants into Rye Harbour'.
Who charged that sum? - we should be told.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.