I Suppose A Condom's Out Of The Question.

[douglas9401]

'It's my right to have unprotected sex with anyone, anytime so don't judge me when I get some disease because it's all your fault' lisped a precious darling.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-62425720

[Untitled]

if you limit partners to people who have been vaccinated it doesn’t make much difference… but yes limiting sexual partners is also a good idea

[1ozzy]

If rather boring

[Peter Pedant]

If I were religious I'd say "for Gods sake".
I am not particularly r3eligious and I say - for gods sake

actually I say Chrissakes a lot - I might say that

AND
//they are taking responsibility //
Not if they're leading an irresponsible lifestyle.

how true how true - well spotted that gairl ! - a paradox constructed out of the foregoing posts. ( resp / not resp)
The fact she says the opposite further up, I will draw one of the 7 veils over

and no to re-iterate ( I find I have to do that quite a lot over a week end on AB) - people do not have a right to infect people with diseases. They have a duty not to ( see Hohfeld juridical correlatives)

well that is my little 3 s of education on AB over

[Untitled]

life is all about tradeoffs i suppose ozzy!

[Peter Pedant]

// If rather boring//
I am sure someone has shown you live longer if you do
( limit partners - oh yes, ca cervix)

[SparklyKid]

Education from PP,lol. Just gibberish garbage ramblings.

[1ozzy]

There's a balance somewhere.

[Peter Pedant]

hi sparkly - firing on all cylinders I see.
so .... sparkly thinks you DO have a right to infect everyone
well - screw that sparkly - does your wife know?
and can we see the video where she does hur hur hur

[Togo]

Apparently the disease is rampant in the Commons. Clapham ... Tooting....

[Paigntonian]

failed: If it's only to do with skin contact why are the 'lgbtq+ community' seemingly has the most confirmed cases and is apparently more at risk?

[douglas9401]

Possibly because they're very thin-skinned.

[naomi24]

10.32. Good question, paigntonian.

[Untitled]

it isn’t the lgbtq community… it’s gay and bi men.

the reason they are more at risk is that a high proportion of them have a high number of casual sexual partners

[Untitled]

I.e. lesbians bi women and trans people are not particularly at risk… men who have sex with men are, so they are seeking access to the vaccine which fortunately exists

[Prudie]

I am unsure of the motivation for the explanation but as nearly all cases in UK are in men who have sex with men it is inconceivable that this can solely be explained that they they have more skin to skin contact than other groups. I'm sure there are a fair number of straight people 'putting it about' regularly too yet they are not featuring in the stats. It must be something to do with the way they have sex.

[douglas9401]

Lesbians are world renowned for their arms-length sexual exploits though, never knowingly having skin to skin contact.

Aye, right you are then.

Somebody's telling porkies.

[aelmpvw]

i live life on the edge, i'll shake hands with my gay friends when i meet them . . .

[Togo]

//i live life on the edge, i'll shake hands with my gay friends when i meet them//

The boxing gloves will be a bit of a give away Ael. :))

[Peter Pedant]

never pick a fist fight with a lesbian - - she'll win

[Peter Pedant]

it is observational ( = in AB speak "they see it")
lots on the LGBTQ+ side

a lot of genital lesions - ( poss trauma localisation)
o god that will get the AB OAPs waggling their what-sits

( sparko gags: what's a whatsit, what dat?)