//Brexists are quite relaxed about giving up a bit of sovereignty for the benefit of trade if it's for the USA or the CPTPP or the WTO...//
Let’s leave aside the fact that any trade agreements the UK reaches will be solely on its terms and that of the partner (rather than being railroaded into a deal which must satisfy the needs of 27 other nations). Instead, tell us which of the articles of “sovereignty” I mentioned at 19:24 on 7th September in this question, do you think the USA, the CPTPP or the WTO will insist on:
https://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question1809371-4.html
//..all of which either or do or would expect us to toe their lines even if they don't bother with courts or parliaments...//
Of course, courts and Parliaments are a side show. It doesn’t really matter whether the UK is subject to their rulings or not, I suppose.
//... the bit of "sovereignty" that Brexists really had a problem with was free movement... that was it... I do wish they would do the rest of us the courtesy of being honest about it.//
As I explained earlier, I decided I’d like the UK to leave the EU in 1992. At that time, free movement was not such an issue for anybody and certainly wasn’t for me. However, let's assume that it was a major or even the sole decisive factor for some people? So what? Are they not entitled to have an opinion on such an important matter? Do you think the UK electorate has no cause for concern that 450m people have the unfettered right to settle here legally? Are they supposed to just bear their serious concerns with stoicism because it’s for “the greater good”?