ChatterBank0 min ago
Truss Hasn’t Called Sturgeon
53 Answers
Since the former took office.
https:/
Nice dig at the end though from Sturgeon!
/She added: "I don't know whether that is arrogance, lack of respect or insecurity or whatever it is. It's not the right way to do government in a grown up way.
"So I hope we will see a change. I'll do my best to work with Liz Truss as constructively as possible or whoever comes after because we can't take anything for granted in UK politics these days."/
I reckon she’s fight, it’s insecurity.
https:/
Nice dig at the end though from Sturgeon!
/She added: "I don't know whether that is arrogance, lack of respect or insecurity or whatever it is. It's not the right way to do government in a grown up way.
"So I hope we will see a change. I'll do my best to work with Liz Truss as constructively as possible or whoever comes after because we can't take anything for granted in UK politics these days."/
I reckon she’s fight, it’s insecurity.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by FatticusInch. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
//I reckon she’s fight, it’s insecurity.//
I don't think it is. From the BBC report:
"Ms Truss branded Ms Sturgeon as an "attention seeker" who was best ignored during the Tory leadership contest."
That's probably nearer the truth. Quite why the Prime Minister should speak to Ms Sturgeon if she has nothing to say is a little unclear. The "First Ministers" (or whatever each of them is called) of the devolved administrations have ideas above their station. They are simply administering a small number of devolved powers which were unwisely granted in the early days of the Blair government and which have caused nothing but aggravation ever since. It is ludicrous that a nation like the UK should have devolved "governments" representing such a small minority of the population (around 15% in total). Devolution needs to be reversed forthwith; then Ms Sturgeon would have no need to worry about the Prime Minister not bothering to phone her.
I don't think it is. From the BBC report:
"Ms Truss branded Ms Sturgeon as an "attention seeker" who was best ignored during the Tory leadership contest."
That's probably nearer the truth. Quite why the Prime Minister should speak to Ms Sturgeon if she has nothing to say is a little unclear. The "First Ministers" (or whatever each of them is called) of the devolved administrations have ideas above their station. They are simply administering a small number of devolved powers which were unwisely granted in the early days of the Blair government and which have caused nothing but aggravation ever since. It is ludicrous that a nation like the UK should have devolved "governments" representing such a small minority of the population (around 15% in total). Devolution needs to be reversed forthwith; then Ms Sturgeon would have no need to worry about the Prime Minister not bothering to phone her.
New Judge
// Quite why the Prime Minister should speak to Ms Sturgeon if she has nothing to say is a little unclear. //
It’s called common courtesy and statesmanship.
As she pointed out, nothing to say or not she had a call from May, Cameron and Johnson within days of each taking office.
I know Truss said she was prepared to be unpopular but why is she making such a huge effort to be so with everyone?
// Quite why the Prime Minister should speak to Ms Sturgeon if she has nothing to say is a little unclear. //
It’s called common courtesy and statesmanship.
As she pointed out, nothing to say or not she had a call from May, Cameron and Johnson within days of each taking office.
I know Truss said she was prepared to be unpopular but why is she making such a huge effort to be so with everyone?
New judge did you see the post about bio mass
https:/
https:/
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.