Donate SIGN UP

This Is Just Ridiculous - Money Grubbers Trying To Exploit New Law.

Avatar Image
Canary42 | 22:11 Wed 04th Jan 2023 | News
21 Answers
https://uk.yahoo.com/news/romeo-juliet-stars-sue-over-023800284.html

More has-beens trying to cash in on their glory-days,

OR

Couple genuinely mentally harmed by their erstwhile stardom ?

You choose.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 21rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
//Whiting's bare buttocks and Hussey's bare breasts are briefly shown during the scene.//

I wonder how they have calculated that is worth $500m?
they were kids. It should never have been allowed to happen. Zeffirelli also spent some time pursuing Bruce Robinson, who was in his early 20s and played Benvolio. As far as I know Robinson hasn't sued - but he later wrote and directed Withnail & I, and based Uncle Monty on Zeffirelli.
Virginia Giuffre may yet return to court if a sliding scale's being set.
Here comes the gravy train toot toot!!
Ridiculous.
If the story is true - she was 15 and the world saw her breasts when she thought it wouldn't - then I can see why it would have caused her some mental trauma. Going to be very hard to prove that though, and if it goes to court I am sure there'll be some lovely stories about her 'character' brought up and she'll wish she never bothered. $4-5 mil payout at most I'd say if they win.
Can you blame them? And no doubt their lawyers will be getting a decent pay packet from it.
NJ: // //Whiting's bare buttocks and Hussey's bare breasts are briefly shown during the scene.

I wonder how they have calculated that is worth $500m? //

Buttocks £150m and breasts $350m I'd say, can't see it being 50/50.
It’s only taken them going on 60 years to decide they’re upset.
Reminds me of the guy who was the naked baby on the cover of the Nirvana album.
He dined out on it for years, then changed his story when greedy thoughts entered his head.
He lost.
Given that the courts do regularly produce ridiculous decisions, it's no surprise that people will take a punt on a ridiculous claim every now and then.

(See also the Nirvana baby).
this happened when they were teenagers; if they'd complained at the time nobody would have been interested; directors were thought to be gods who could do what they liked, and many got away with a lot. Look at the way John Landis illegally hired two young children for Twilight Zone and put them in a helicopter; it crashed and they died. He was acquitted.

In those days you had only 10 years to complain. This has recently been greatly extended precisely so people can at last take action and be listened to.
Almost 60 years? Come off it Jno. I think this is what’s called building up a retirement pension.
I've seen it written that justice should have no time limit but maybe that's just for cases where the great and the good can puff out their chests and pontificate about this and that.

paramount has plenty of dosh to spare and this will correct a wrong... paramount will in turn get to look conscientious

don't see that anyone is being harmed by this
hi Jno
Altho as a child I laughed at such a thing ( everything was forever onward and upward and better!)
arent we judging past events according to our current taboos and preferences?

Just as the Victorians looked back wiv disapproval on the activities of ( Qu V's) wicked uncles.

who got a long memory den

in the round before the films release, did Hussey do interviews with Simon Dee ( Ha!) or wogan
where this was specifically broached and she said yeah so what

the scene is where mama comes in and says wake!
and find them both in bed
didnt
didnt Hussey do a round of interview
( yes she did)
sozz a to confuse
Who knows, none of us have the full facts.

60 years is a bit ridiculous, seems they have waited until the witnesses are all dead.
Perlease!
I wondered why the state of California decided to temporarily suspend the statute of limitations for child sex abuse, so I googled and found this which is very interesting.
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-12-28/child-sex-abuse-lawsuits-california-deadline-ab218

It's not a new law by the way, Canary.

1 to 20 of 21rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

This Is Just Ridiculous - Money Grubbers Trying To Exploit New Law.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.