Jobs & Education0 min ago
Well Done Rishi.....common Sense.
38 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.For those who might be thinking it was only SNP MSPs voting in favour of the Bill, this is how the voting went.
Scottish National Party
54 for, 9 against
Scottish Labour
18 for, 2 against
Scottish Liberal Democrats
4 for, 0 against
Scottish Green Party
7 for, 0 against
Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
3 for, 28 against
There was support from some members of all the parties in the Parliament.
Scottish National Party
54 for, 9 against
Scottish Labour
18 for, 2 against
Scottish Liberal Democrats
4 for, 0 against
Scottish Green Party
7 for, 0 against
Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
3 for, 28 against
There was support from some members of all the parties in the Parliament.
Last I heard Scotland sent 59 MPs to Westminster so hardly under anyone's thumb, as is identical to all nations in the Union. On fact it's only England that hasn't any devolved powers, so the English clearly have the best argument for being under the thumb; certainly not any of the privileged countries.
-- answer removed --
//That's right, ride rough shod over the masses,//
But the representatives of "the masses" (i.e. the people of the United Kingdom) have decided that the idea should not be sanctioned. Leaving aside the merits of the plan, Scotland is not an autonomous nation and when its devolved government takes decisions that affect people in the rest of the UK, the Westminster government is entitled to step in. If you are going to prattle on about the masses being ridden over roughshod, it is the 92% of people not living in Scotland who are being ridden over by an administration over which they have no control.
But the representatives of "the masses" (i.e. the people of the United Kingdom) have decided that the idea should not be sanctioned. Leaving aside the merits of the plan, Scotland is not an autonomous nation and when its devolved government takes decisions that affect people in the rest of the UK, the Westminster government is entitled to step in. If you are going to prattle on about the masses being ridden over roughshod, it is the 92% of people not living in Scotland who are being ridden over by an administration over which they have no control.
the paper on which the government have based their section 35 order is here - it makes interesting reading
https:/ /policy exchang e.org.u k/publi cation/ the-sco ttish-g ender-r ecognit ion-ref orm-bil l/#cont ents__a ccordio n
the scottish government have said (their) legislation makes no change to the reserved Equality Act 2010 and that principle is enshrined in the Bill, which is at odds with the above link.
which court gets to decide this?
https:/
the scottish government have said (their) legislation makes no change to the reserved Equality Act 2010 and that principle is enshrined in the Bill, which is at odds with the above link.
which court gets to decide this?
//...which court gets to decide this?//
If the Scottish government opt for a Judicial Review (which I think is the only realistic option open to them) it will be heard in the High Court.
Personally, I believe this should not be a judicial decision. The UK government still has authority over Scotland and actually can revoke the Scotland Act in its entirety if it had the mind to. It is a political decision taken with that in mind.
If the Scottish government opt for a Judicial Review (which I think is the only realistic option open to them) it will be heard in the High Court.
Personally, I believe this should not be a judicial decision. The UK government still has authority over Scotland and actually can revoke the Scotland Act in its entirety if it had the mind to. It is a political decision taken with that in mind.
T.C.L. posted last night that all parties except the Cons. voted heavily in favour of the SNP 's law. I thought that was odd, but I heard today that the Cons. were the only party to allow a free vote on the issue.
I repeat that I consider using vulnerable youngsters as political pawns is despicable.
I repeat that I consider using vulnerable youngsters as political pawns is despicable.
Has anyone thought to have the woman tested for mental impairment I wonder?
She seems to set her face, and what a face it is, against anything regarded by most as 'normal', fighting battles on garbage while 'her' country goes to hell in a handcart in real and tangible ways.
Hateful, incompetent witch of a woman who'll not be missed.
She seems to set her face, and what a face it is, against anything regarded by most as 'normal', fighting battles on garbage while 'her' country goes to hell in a handcart in real and tangible ways.
Hateful, incompetent witch of a woman who'll not be missed.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.