ChatterBank5 mins ago
Pmqs ..Starmer Attacks Sunak... And Wins.
Sunak's Failure to sack Zahawi shows how the PM is hopeless weak and frightened, as Sir Keir reminds him and says we all know why the Pm was reluctant to ask his partys chair questions about family finance and tax avoidence.
Would it be because Sunak and his wife are as guilty as Zahawi is ????.
Would it be because Sunak and his wife are as guilty as Zahawi is ????.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by gulliver1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.well I paid a penalty a few years ago - to the taxman
an issue so complex ( gift as notional disposal for tax ppurposes) that even I didnt understand it.
I wdnt dream of declaring it ever - BUT police for example have to declare debts and some professions ( law I think) dont allow bankrupts ( also Manch city council)
an issue so complex ( gift as notional disposal for tax ppurposes) that even I didnt understand it.
I wdnt dream of declaring it ever - BUT police for example have to declare debts and some professions ( law I think) dont allow bankrupts ( also Manch city council)
Gulliver @ 09.17. Of course its the opposition responsibility to raise issues as mentioned in my original post, that's their job and what 'joe public' would expect. Starmer could learn a lot from great opposition debaters such as the late great John Smith and even Tony Blair. They raised issues which were important to the running and the safety of this country. They did waste precious time raising issues about who paid what in tax.
The lack of any constructive opposition highlights the weakness of the current leader of the opposition.
The lack of any constructive opposition highlights the weakness of the current leader of the opposition.
.And even more so when it comes to paying ....HMRC.
no - the beeb have made a horrendous mess of this and are unwilling to clarify - penalty is payable to the HMRC and is NOT a fine ( payable to the court/state)
and you can be fined AND have a penalty ( Doddie and Lester Piggott).
they are also saying ( probz at the HMRC behest, HMRC emoji nice face) that errors per se dont attract penalties
They do. I am speaking From (bitter, bitter) Experience ( HMRC emoji scowl). The let out is that HMRC never agree it is an innocent error. ( easy that one)
These points are not too er TAXING for the average AB reader are they?
no - the beeb have made a horrendous mess of this and are unwilling to clarify - penalty is payable to the HMRC and is NOT a fine ( payable to the court/state)
and you can be fined AND have a penalty ( Doddie and Lester Piggott).
they are also saying ( probz at the HMRC behest, HMRC emoji nice face) that errors per se dont attract penalties
They do. I am speaking From (bitter, bitter) Experience ( HMRC emoji scowl). The let out is that HMRC never agree it is an innocent error. ( easy that one)
These points are not too er TAXING for the average AB reader are they?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.