ChatterBank1 min ago
Dont You Love It When The Left Eat The Lelt
14 Answers
Will the Guardian now have to cancel ITSELF in row over slavery links sparked by planned podcast?
Nothing like tying yourselves in knots:-)
https:/
Nothing like tying yourselves in knots:-)
https:/
Answers
1 to 14 of 14
No-one should have to apologise for the slave trade. It's history. That was the way of the world, as ghastly as it was. It's just something else for people to add to their list of victimhood. Other companies, still operating today, had their beginnings in the slave trade. One is a nationally known company. You will have seen it's vehicles on every road in this...
08:47 Fri 27th Jan 2023
No-one should have to apologise for the slave trade. It's history. That was the way of the world, as ghastly as it was. It's just something else for people to add to their list of victimhood. Other companies, still operating today, had their beginnings in the slave trade. One is a nationally known company. You will have seen it's vehicles on every road in this country.
It's history. And that's where it belongs. Leave it.
It's history. And that's where it belongs. Leave it.
Waiting for The Guardian? Goining to be a long wait, but here is the Times take if you dont want the DM:
https:/
https:/
The Guardian is making a podcast, and hired 3 producers. The Guardian didn’t like their work, and they were paid for their work, and the project was finished off by different journalists.
The 3 producers complained of ‘microaggressions’ and ‘colourism’. And a ‘bullying, passive-aggressive and obstructive management style’.
Clearly the two sides didn’t get on. The Guardian is perfectly entitled to reject their work if it fell short of what they had commissioned.
The 3 producers wanted to ‘to contribute towards shifting discourse away from the kinds of reductive conversations about race and capitalism’. And the Guardian did not.
// The Scott Trust, which owns the newspaper, has launched a review into John Edward Taylor’s slavery links despite saying there was no evidence that he owned slaves or was directly involved in the trade. //
The 3 producers complained of ‘microaggressions’ and ‘colourism’. And a ‘bullying, passive-aggressive and obstructive management style’.
Clearly the two sides didn’t get on. The Guardian is perfectly entitled to reject their work if it fell short of what they had commissioned.
The 3 producers wanted to ‘to contribute towards shifting discourse away from the kinds of reductive conversations about race and capitalism’. And the Guardian did not.
// The Scott Trust, which owns the newspaper, has launched a review into John Edward Taylor’s slavery links despite saying there was no evidence that he owned slaves or was directly involved in the trade. //
1 to 14 of 14
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.