The Answerbank Party In Government
ChatterBank1 min ago
When You Are Moaning About The Tories......
44 Answers
https:/
....just consider what many on this site wanted and who you could have had running the country and count your blessings.
....just consider what many on this site wanted and who you could have had running the country and count your blessings.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
i notice youngmafbog continues to refer to him as COB because he believes it sounds sinister... how appropriate as many of the things levelled against corbyn were made up
those who bleat about boris being "stitched up" would do well to study the treatment of corbyn impartially... that's what a stitch-up truly looks like
those who bleat about boris being "stitched up" would do well to study the treatment of corbyn impartially... that's what a stitch-up truly looks like
Your triumphalism is highly amusing. The Johnson Government was not at all effective or successful. It was 3 years of chaos and a huge majority squandered. And the only way you can defend the indefensible is to image something that didn’t happen.
People though Boris would be great, and he turned out to be terrible. People thought Corbyn would be terrible and didn’t vote for him. But what they got instead has not lived up to the hype. Funny that you think it has.
People though Boris would be great, and he turned out to be terrible. People thought Corbyn would be terrible and didn’t vote for him. But what they got instead has not lived up to the hype. Funny that you think it has.
the controversy around the handling anti-semitism was manufactured by his opponents (de facto tories) inside the party... the messages studied in the forde report make this undeniable
he was dishonestly represented in the press as some kind of serious political sponsor to terrorists of the world... more details with examples can be found in this study on press bias from LSE
https:/
he was dishonestly represented in the press as some kind of serious political sponsor to terrorists of the world... more details with examples can be found in this study on press bias from LSE
https:/
In 2019 we faced a surreal Christmas election with two party leaders neither of whom was remotely fit to be PM.
Johnson in fairness did what he was elected to do but perhaps inevitably departed the scene early - the Tories after a brief aberration called Liz Truss - have a sensible leader again and so do Labour but it seems the old leaders of 2019 won’t go away. I hope Starmer succeeds in this: Corbyn has brought shame in the party: he can stand as an independent but no way should he be allowed to stand for Labour
Johnson in fairness did what he was elected to do but perhaps inevitably departed the scene early - the Tories after a brief aberration called Liz Truss - have a sensible leader again and so do Labour but it seems the old leaders of 2019 won’t go away. I hope Starmer succeeds in this: Corbyn has brought shame in the party: he can stand as an independent but no way should he be allowed to stand for Labour
I wouldn’t describe Starmer as a sensible leader by any stretch of the imagination. Don’t forget he was an avid supporter of a Corbyn before it suited him to boot the old boy out, and he’s clearly prone to making what he thinks are the right noises and going with whichever way he thinks the wind is blowing. His latest initiative is to protect women from physical violence. That coming from a man who was instrumental in preventing the deportation of a violent criminal who attacked two women has to be an unfunny joke. In fact he can’t even tell us what a woman is. Sensible? No. An untrustworthy politician with delusions of grandeur? Certainly.
I know this is a hobbyhorse of mine but you only have to see Corbyn being interviewed about Ukraine to see how totally unsuited he is to sensible politics.
The Labour government of the time was
more or less a founding father of NATO: there is no place IMO in a mainstream party for people who’d put our security at risk.
The Labour government of the time was
more or less a founding father of NATO: there is no place IMO in a mainstream party for people who’d put our security at risk.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.