Donate SIGN UP

So Will The Muslim Grooming Gangs Now Be Dealt With?

Avatar Image
ToraToraTora | 17:18 Mon 03rd Apr 2023 | News
56 Answers
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65160429
..ignore the PC cobras and the apologists and nick the lowlives.
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 56rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Avatar Image
No one should be interpreting the appalling saga of Muslim grooming gangs - and moreover the abject disregard for the well-being of their young victims - as anything other than it is. A shameful indictment upon the authorities and upon the dishonest, kowtowing, sycophantic, weak-minded society we have become.
15:27 Tue 04th Apr 2023
You raise a valid point there - it's an appalling dereliction of duty by those who should be responsible for the vulnerable girls.

However, there needs to be some debate on the data.

Prof Ella Cockbain from University College London was on The News Agents (excellent podcast by the way) and has expressed concerns over the inconsistency of the data being used (alluded to in the clip I posted). The data we have doesn't really add up in any way.

She goes further though. Sajid Javid, when he was Home Secretary, commissioned the Home Office to produce a piece of research on grooming gangs. It found that the majority of those convicted of grooming were white British (as you'd expect looking at demographics), but there was no evidence of over-representation of ethnic groups in grooming gangs.

This was the Home Office's own data.

This is a very long report but some of it makes for persuasive reading:

https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10087386/7/Cockbain_0306396819895727.pdf

And here's the News Agents podcast on the same:

https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-news-agents/id1640878689?i=1000607166032

I think the overall thrust isn't that these crimes have been committed, but we should challenge the narrative that (as Suella Braverman has claimed) this is an issue related to Pakistani men "who hold cultural values totally at odds with British values"...and look at the evidence (data).
Question Author
bang on Naomi 16:27, the apologists amaze me.
TTT

You're being very naughty goading naomi24 like that.

We can all see what you're doing!

;-)
Question Author
I can see what YOU are doing sp.
As can everyone else. SP’s usual tack.
naomi24

If you want to put up an argument or forcefully state your point of view, that's great for the site. But when you start making little digs at others in the News section, more often they will make digs at you and then the whole thing becomes a slanging match and the Ed steps in and starts removing posts or deleting threads. You've seen it happen before, haven't you?

I can tell you're passionate about this subject however if someone here offers a view on a subject best to go after the view, rather than the challenger.

Believe me - I'm not trying to be sanctimonious...I've seen how upset you get with other members of the News section and can see how to avoid it.
SP. Will you please stop patronising me. You do exactly the same thing every time your argument fails. I can only suggest you adopt a better argument.
Naomi; Ha, Ha. You are the Queen of Patronising!
But I still like you! :-)
naomi24

I don't.

I try my very best to remain on subject and if you ever see me attack someone directly you're free to call me on it.

And I'm not patronising you. If it comes across that way I'm sorry. I like it when someone who had opposing views forms a forensic argument (New Judge does this).

Also my argument hasn't exactly failed...it's just you who disagrees with me. That's hardly the definition of a failed argument is it?
Sorry - I meant to write, "it's just that you disagree with me", and not "it's just you who disagrees with me"

Subtle difference.
Thank you for the apology, sp.
You're welcome naomi24 - don't mention it. I sincerely hope you take even just a little of my comments onboard. If you rise above the morons, rather than getting into the pit with them then THEY will end up looking impotent.
Sp, Your advice is surplus to requirements, but thank you anyway.
Ah well - can’t say I didn’t try!
I’d rather you respect my wishes and stop ‘trying’, SP. You may rest assured I know very well how the site works.
naomi24

I'm sure you do - but unfortunately there are some who just like mud-slinging rather than debating.

For them this section of the AnswerBank has become an area to score points. If you don't them oxygen then they will starve. All they want is attention and the last word.

And I'm not referring to you if that's what you're now thinking.
Also, I won't be trying to counsel you on your behaviour here. I'm not the Ed! It will be down to him / her to monitor contributors who violate Site Rules. Consider this unwanted advice!
But yes - I'll respect your wishes and will not advise you on your behaviour to others. If however I feel the need to pull you up in your use of language to me, I will do so.
I’m not entirely sure what that means, SP, and I’ve no idea which site rule you think I’ve violated - I am au fait with them - but if the Eds have a problem with my behaviour doubtless they’ll let me know. They seem happy enough so far.
What language to you? What on earth are you talking about?

21 to 40 of 56rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

So Will The Muslim Grooming Gangs Now Be Dealt With?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.