Quizzes & Puzzles43 mins ago
Come On Go Easy.....
12 Answers
https:/
...if anyone needs a motorhome it's the leader of the SNP!
...if anyone needs a motorhome it's the leader of the SNP!
Answers
1 to 12 of 12
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Politicians (of all colours) must think voters were born yesterday.
Do they really expect people to believe a £110k luxury campervan that can sleep, say, 4 people was purchased as a battle bus, when it would have been significantly cheaper to hire a campervan? (Even though it's more realistic a tour bus would have been hired rather than a campervan).
For £110k they could have hired a 6 berth for 866 days.
https:/
Do they really expect people to believe a £110k luxury campervan that can sleep, say, 4 people was purchased as a battle bus, when it would have been significantly cheaper to hire a campervan? (Even though it's more realistic a tour bus would have been hired rather than a campervan).
For £110k they could have hired a 6 berth for 866 days.
https:/
didnt one of the great pontificators of AB write: ( on thee golliwog thread)
Owning golliwogs is not illegal so it can only be because they caused offence.
and so here,
as we note the vehicle has been seized
Owning a motorhome is not illegal so it can only be because it caused offence.
on AB you can rely on someone writing complete rot. Here by the way, the article cd have been connected with the commission of an offence ( according to Chris' article) and may have been (re)moved
Note reader TTT goes all poncey over the removal of golliwogs and yet doesnt bat an eyelid over the removal of a motorhome ( one, owned lawfully)
only on AB
Owning golliwogs is not illegal so it can only be because they caused offence.
and so here,
as we note the vehicle has been seized
Owning a motorhome is not illegal so it can only be because it caused offence.
on AB you can rely on someone writing complete rot. Here by the way, the article cd have been connected with the commission of an offence ( according to Chris' article) and may have been (re)moved
Note reader TTT goes all poncey over the removal of golliwogs and yet doesnt bat an eyelid over the removal of a motorhome ( one, owned lawfully)
only on AB
1 to 12 of 12
