News1 min ago
Was The Bbc Chairman Selection Process Rigged?
As Boris only wanted Sharp in the role of BBC Chair, could those candidates who were interviewed for the job, sue the BBC as the selection process for the post was clearly rigged?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by barney15c. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.it was rigged, yes. The other candidates should have given Boris money.
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ media/2 023/apr /28/ric hard-sh arp-key -inquir y-findi ngs-how -he-was -appoin ted-bbc -chair
https:/
'Both the panel and ministers were “disappointed” by the quality of the applicants for the position of BBC chair, with the investigation concluding other candidates may have discouraged others from coming forward due to the perception that Sharp was being lined up for the role.'
Sounds like the others wouldn't have been chosen anyway.
Sounds like the others wouldn't have been chosen anyway.
-- answer removed --
davebro
The BBC is in a unique and great position to make a big mark on the TV content and streaming market. With the potential to make a lot of money.
The only thing holding them back is interference from politicians, and nepotism over trade experience of appointees.
The BBC could be a global phenomenon, and reap vast profits from oversees sales. As it is, it is held back by amateurs every step of the way.
The BBC is in a unique and great position to make a big mark on the TV content and streaming market. With the potential to make a lot of money.
The only thing holding them back is interference from politicians, and nepotism over trade experience of appointees.
The BBC could be a global phenomenon, and reap vast profits from oversees sales. As it is, it is held back by amateurs every step of the way.
naughty jno - bad puppy
I don’t think I would know enough to say yay or nay even so (itch)
The decision was clearly bad - as he has resigned
but does a bad decision mean it must be rigged
no
remember, he shd have declared a conflict of interest
the doctors incredz were whining about conflicts 25 y ago.
https:/ /www.bm j.com/c ontent/ 317/715 4/291/r apid-re sponses
in which I figure somewhere
I suggest the question is not "should I declare an interest?" but rather - "if I dont declare a fact, and it comes out later, will other people say "oh! oh! that makes it completely different!" ?
this last thing has happened here
I don’t think I would know enough to say yay or nay even so (itch)
The decision was clearly bad - as he has resigned
but does a bad decision mean it must be rigged
no
remember, he shd have declared a conflict of interest
the doctors incredz were whining about conflicts 25 y ago.
https:/
in which I figure somewhere
I suggest the question is not "should I declare an interest?" but rather - "if I dont declare a fact, and it comes out later, will other people say "oh! oh! that makes it completely different!" ?
this last thing has happened here
PP, in this case the job ad specifically said "You cannot be considered for a public appointment ... if you fail to declare any conflict of interest".
I have this on the authority of Ros Atkins (at 3.55)
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/a v/uk-65 430947
I have this on the authority of Ros Atkins (at 3.55)
https:/
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.