Ed Davey Women Penis

[fender62]

another kier supporter, women and penises..meh.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1773467/ed-davey-women-penis-trans-lib-dem

[Deskdiary]

I find it interesting the responses from the leaders of three parties of what a woman is.

Ed Davey thinks some women "clearly" have a penis.

SKS refused to define a woman, but has now said 1 in 1000 women have a penis.

Only Sunak was prepared to say women do not have penises.

So what we can glean from this is that only Sunak was prepared to confirm an undeniable biological fact...or in other words, only Sunak was prepared to be truthful.

[ToraToraTora]

PMSL, they do seem to struggle with basic biology these lefties!

[Hopkirk]

Each says what their adviser tells them will get most votes.

[Old_Geezer]

In which case, some need new advisors.

[retrocop]

These so called men are cowards. They make me sick with their vote catching propaganda . Do we really need these idiots as future leaders of our country?

[ToraToraTora]

19:02 - do they really think that denying Biological facts gets them more votes?

[mushroom25]

to the strict letter of the law (as it stands), Ed Davey is correct, under the Gender Recognition Act, 2004.

https://www.gov.uk/apply-gender-recognition-certificate

// Having a certificate means you can:
* update your birth or adoption certificate, if it was registered in the UK
* get married or form a civil partnership in your affirmed gender
* update your marriage or civil partnership certificate, if it was registered in the UK
* have your affirmed gender on your death certificate when you die //

with the certificate in your hand, you are legally of your chosen gender. even if, (as per the "who can apply" page from the link), you haven't had re-assignment surgery, or even if you don't intend having such surgery.

[Deskdiary]

Hopkirk’s correct.

I don’t believe for a second that Davey and Starmer believe the nonsense they stated, they’ve said it simply because they’ve been told the optics (to use an annoying buzz-word) will play well.

Quite why they choose to
lie, given half the electorate are proper women, is beyond me.

[ToraToraTora]

Gender recognition act? Perlease!

[fender62]

so if you vote labour or liberal you know what they think of biological sex, there is none, the majority of the uk voters do not agree with this new ideology, this is all trickling down into schools and childrens education now and into the future, vore for either of the above then you agree with all this trans nonsense.

[Deskdiary]

I have no issue with people identifying as the opposite sex - if that’s how they feel then that’s how they feel, but I simply cannot get on board with the lie that women have penises, because it’s biologically not correct.

Sex is immutable.

[Atheist]

All the posters here seem obsessed with penises. Have they nothing better to think about?

[Deskdiary]

^^^Have you nothing meaningful to add?

[drmorgans]

Atheist, men with vaginas?

[retrocop]

//Atheist, men with vaginas?//

My retort is so tempting. :-) Better not.

[Atheist]

Why is it so important to people? Some have red hair. Some have buck teeth. Some have hare lips. Some have fat bums. What's the problem with people being different?

[drmorgans]

Because some ladies with *** want to go into the ladies with vaginas changing rooms.

[ichkeria]

This has to be News Thread Title of the Year

So far

[drmorgans]

Wait 'til we get Sir Keir Starmey Man Vagina

[New Judge]

.//with the certificate in your hand, you are legally of your chosen gender.//

Indeed. But since gender is now largely a matter of opinion (mainly courtesy of the very legislation you quote) it is somewhat meaningless.

Mr Davey is the latest in a line of somewhat ignoble politicians attempting to get the electorate to accept fiction as fact. I don't have a lot of time for Mr Sunak - I believe that as a Prime Minister he'd make a half decent carpet salesman. But he's the only one of the three main English party leaders to get the answer to this particular question right.