Deskdiary - // Having just watched the video posted by ellipses, and I know I’m going to crucified for this, I don’t really see what all the fuss is about. //
The 'fuss' is about a woman imagining that an animal will understand that it's running down the road, and being punched in the face, are connected, and that it's a reasonable way to treat an animal.
Her reasons are flawed, for all her protestations that she 'loves animals' - she neglected to mention that foxes are an exception, but that's for another debate.
Frightening, if not actually seriously hurting, a large animal, is not the way to educate its behaviour.
Her approach that it is makes her a cruel and unreasonable person, whose keeping of animals she treats in that way, was highlighted and challenged in the court.
The judgement is that she is 'not guilty' in a legal sense, but the film evidence clearly shows that she was, and given her endless protestations, probably still is, someone who is cruel to animals, and she is never going to see that she is wrong, or adjust her behaviour.