Donate SIGN UP

Two Groups Superfluous To Society

Avatar Image
douglas9401 | 17:44 Mon 04th Mar 2024 | News
17 Answers

Get their handbags out.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68468019

Let's see what develops.

Gravatar

Answers

1 to 17 of 17rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by douglas9401. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

The clergy and wedding photographers?

Damn savages....etc

they would be on the hitchhikers spaceship with the hairdressers & the telephone sanitizers

The Golgafrincham "B" ark.

Simple enough to find out what the religious restrictions are before agreeing a church, and ensuring your photographer knows and accepts them. Ultimately it's the unfortunate couple that's paying for the services they want.

Question Author

If God hadn't wanted photographers in church he wouldn't have allowed cameras to be invented.

Say jeez!

&ab_channel=ABCNews

Unbelievable! Such a negative response..

Question Author

The whole situation needs exposure, Patsy.

Be fair, people.  You don't have to get married in  church.  If you do then you should understand that the vicar is the person i/c and it's his/her church and there are rules.

It's more than just a picturesque setting. I can offer a lovely 11thC church if anyone is interested?

Not even in a church for them, then. The priest should know what this is about the couple and learn tolerance. To threaten to end the ceremony is well out of order, and his position should be seriously considered by his church authorities.

^^^ The film clip is American I think.  

Was a flash involved?..

Given that the ceremony is in the open air, the minister has no right to behave with such crass insensitivity.

Yes the clicks are annoying, but the day is about the bride and groom, and they want photos to remember it by, for themselves, and their children and grandchildren.

Now, with digital photography, cameras don;t click anymore, although, bizarrely, you get them with 'click' sound built in for that nostangia feeling.

I think any minister should be aware that it is an impotant event, but a little courtesy never hurts on the day.

The way around it is to discuss with your minister in advance if he or she has any objections to photographers, and if so, what and where, then everyone knows where they stand - literally.

I can't see what's wrong with the picture: she's got her cleavage in, there's a cross in the background and he's got his tackle well protected. Where's the beef?

I personally wish them a happy future. 🙂

 

 

Khandro - // 

I can't see what's wrong with the picture: she's got her cleavage in, there's a cross in the background and he's got his tackle well protected. Where's the beef?

I personally wish them a happy future. 🙂 //

The minister was objecting to what he perceived to be the intrusive prescence and camera clicking from the wedding photography team.

How is that connected to your observation?

I've been to a wedding where the vicar berated the congregation before starting the ceremony. It was weird to say the least.

My theory is that some of them are bitter about the fact the usual congregation is two old ladies and a dog, but everyone turns up for a wedding.

1 to 17 of 17rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Two Groups Superfluous To Society

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.