Protests Erupt In Syria Over Christmas...
News0 min ago
No best answer has yet been selected by bluefortress. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.davebro - // Do I have to add "after due process" to everything? //
No, you simply have to apply the enshrined legal right to a charge, trial, and conviction, before you start condemning an innocent man to your own summary version of justice.
//And him drowning himself wouldn't involve vigilantes would it. //
No, but let's not assume that he feels the need to drown himself, because, at the time of writing, we don't know he has actually done anything wrong.
Naomi - // No I don't agree. Given the ppolice are searching for him and telling the public not to approach him, I see nothing to be objective about. //
Experience tells me that the usual suspect will have this man guilty and executed on the basis that he may be a Muslim alone, but that's not how proper debate works - and I have always thought of you as someone who brings dispassionaite argument to any discussion.
Being a 'person of interest' does not make the man guilty, it makes him a 'person of interest'.
TTT - // I see the Muslim fan club is in full swing as is usual when one of them do their party piece! //
There is no 'Muslim fan club', and your flippancy is abhorrent.
As I pointed out previously, you have no idea of this man's religion, and to date he has not been charged with a crime.
Try taking a breath and looking at facts, not your over-heated imagination.
Interestingly when a white male charged with historic sexual offences was discussed a few weeks ago we were told
//
He has been charged.
How about we wait until the Court has assesed the evidence and come to a verdict eh?//
The individual in this thread has not even been charged but some have pronounced him guilty and handed out the death penalty!