Christmas In The Good Old Days
ChatterBank3 mins ago
The charges against activist and independent journalist Tommy Robinson were dropped today (Tuesday) after a judge at the Westminster Magistrates’ Court found that a police order banning him from a protest in London was unlawful.
After which he said; “The point I want people to understand, I’ve just said I’ve won. Have we won? Do we have freedom? For the last six months I’ve been banned from entering my capital city, while jihadists have taken over our capital city, week in week out with the grace of the police allowing them to. I’ve had my restrictions, my right to a family life, I even went to court to ask whether I could take my children to the Christmas lights turn-on and I was refused that opportunity.
“For the last six months I’ve had to go to a Muslim police officer and ask permission to come into my own capital city, of which one of the meetings was to interview a member of Parliament. That Muslim police officer refused that request. That is a police state, that is not freedom. The judge today stood on the side of truth, but I have been in these politicised buildings too many times."
All true, but would andy-hughes agree?
Khandro,
I am a little bemused as to why exactly you bother or care what Andy Hughes opines about this case. His views about Robinson are well known on this site and he is never slow in coming forward and lecturing us about the merits of UK law and due process blah blah. Well here it is seen to work in Mr Robinson's favour so Mr Hughes views are largely irrelevant and he will just have to suck it up just as many of us do when the law appeaers to be capricious and works in favour of serious miscreants that we believe should be banged up but are presented with contrary views from Mr Hughes. The Law works both ways. Like it or lump it.
Police paperwork fail. Justice denied, on both sides ...
https:/
Tommy Robinson case collapses over police paperwork
A senior Met Police officer who signed the dispersal order had previously told Westminster Magistrates' Court he had used the wrong date.
On Tuesday, District Judge Daniel Sternberg ruled there was no case to answer.
//Robinson has been convicted for multiple crimes involving violence, stalking, financial and immigration fraud, drug possession, public order offences, and contempt of court//
No doubt someone will crop up and tell us that the law does not work on assumptions and what may be. Previous drug convictions and contempt should not apply for future intent to attend a protest meeting.
I hope however that you don't imagine Andy Hughes somehow thinks alone on this matter. Robinson is a grubby little racist thug and it saddens me that respectable people would stand up for him. If most other people donned the mantle of put-upon victimhood that TR does they'd rightly be condemned. Probably by many of the same people.
How do people think that the British way of life, and traditions, should be preserved and expressed? What are British traditions? What is the British way of life? If TR could clearly tell us why he behaves like he does, we might have some insight into his reasoning. Not understanding. Just insight. Wot? No need.He's just a racist thug? Hey ho!
10 c //He's just a racist thug?//
He would seem to have ample grounds for not being too enamoured with the Muslim population of the UK. I don't think he has much to say about other races (not that Muslims are a race anyway).
As to being a "thug"; when he was a lad he got into punch-ups at football matches just like thousands of other young men. I knew the scene well, as a I lived for a while close to a first division football ground.
Those boys I would suggest are living normal lives amongst us today and no one calls them thugs, but for Tommy it never goes away.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.