ChatterBank7 mins ago
So Hugh Edwards Is A Sex Offender
and only six months suspended for 2 years ....and 7 years on the register
great may be the fall but Joe Public wouldn't get that leniency....
BBC News
Answers
"By viewing such images he is partly responsible for creating a market for them, and as such is "encouraging" others to do the abuse. This is not a victimless crime and in my view the penalty should be raised"
Well said, Rosetta. My view also.
As for the comment by Maydup at 15.38 that he is
"not dangerous enough to be locked up",
how can you possibly know that? Men who show interest in such child abuse images are showing their complete disregard for the rights, the dignity or the safety of the child. I would not trust such a man anywhere near a child. In my view, he is most definitely "dangerous enough to be locked up".
To say Joe Public wouldn't get such a lenient sentence isn't true
I've already said the man who sent him the images got a suspended sentence; so did this teacher in today's paper who had sex with a pupil
Teacher at £44,000-a-year boarding school who had sex with a teenage pupil is banned for life https:/
I just wonder about men who get their kicks by viewing children been raped (child porn is a misnomer...these kids didnt consent, its rape)
Ive been sent to prison for less.
Spent the day with my 3 yr old grandaughter yesterday. The thought of anyone looking at her in a sexual way would see me doing a life sentence for effing murder!
And this creep gets to go home!!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.