News2 mins ago
A Full Inquiry Into The Grooming Gang Scandal
Would you support it?
Answers
We know much of the who/when/why of the rapists.We need to find out who made the decisions
16:07 Fri 03rd Jan 2025
Last evening at 8:00pm I switched on the telly to see the BBC news. Considering the brewing shot-storm over the grooming-gang scandal, I expected that to have some prominence.
What did they lead with? - Trudeau, well OK that's quite big news, then next ? the UK weather.
I switched to Sky & they were talking about the NHS.
I think both these MSM, if there is an inquiry, may be criticised for their lack of coverage over a long time & will keep reports on the back-burner.
I had to turn to GB News where every aspect of the issue was being discussed at length.
Funny that.
@11.20. We all know who the PM was in 2008 ... Gordon Brown. Being steered ,no doubt, by Bliar and his wicked witch on all things immigrant and yuman rites. Particularly if they were from Asian backgrounds. More legal interference in our political workings. He did promise to "rub their noses in it" but never would we have thought he meant the children. Evil personified.
I'm unsure how much all these enquiries cost, but some issues are so 'in your face' in present day society that a full investigation seems the only way to get an accepted understanding of them. This grooming scandle being one of them. (Many of the things that also could do with investigating seem to be related to immigration/culture, sometimes it seems they are all just the same issue, not exclusively of course, but in a large part. One has to remind oneself that they are separate problems.)
.......'The racially and religiously motivated element of these heinous crimes remains hardly discussed. The Telford inquiry (2022) revealed more than 1,000 girls were abused, and said it had gone on for decades, beginning as far back as the 1980s. The Jay report into Rotherham (2014) said that 1,400 children in the town were subject to ‘appalling’ abuse over 16 years from 1997. The ‘majority’ of known perpetrators were of Pakistani heritage. In Oxford, there may have been as many as 373 victims.
The harrowing reports of what children in Britain have endured over the last few decades are nightmarish. Several children were murdered (one was allegedly dismembered and disposed of at a kebab shop), a girl was kept caged and made to act like a dog, abusers routinely tortured children, a perpetrator branded ‘M’ (for Mohammed) on a victim’s buttock with a hairpin to indicate ownership, and an aborted foetus was taken by the police for DNA purposes, without the 13-year-old grooming victim being told. In some cases, the girls were dismissed by the authorities as ‘child prostitutes’ and betrayed by the very people tasked with their welfare. The police botched investigations, fathers trying to save daughters were arrested, and cries of ‘racism’ shut down discussion about a clear pattern of criminality occurring within local authorities, emboldening perpetrators.
But amongst the darkness, there has been light, not least the efforts of Andrew Norfolk, whose investigations for the Times triggered the Rotherham inquiry. Whistleblowers like Jayne Senior and Maggie Oliver, and former prosecutor Nazir Afzal deserve credit. So, too, does Sarah Champion, the Labour MP for Rotherham, who received death threats and was forced to quit her role as shadow equalities minister in 2017 after she wrote, ‘Britain has a problem with British Pakistani men raping and exploiting white girls’. We must also pay tribute to courageous campaigning survivors like Sammy Woodhouse, Samantha Smith, Dr Ella Hill and Elizabeth Harper.
Musk’s intervention has put the global spotlight on the issue and there is mounting pressure on the government to act. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has called for a national inquiry into grooming gangs.....'
The Spectator.
It's not what you want, it's what the victims want that is important.
Professor Alexis Jay, the woman who has already led a seven-year inquiry into child sexual abuse, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that victims "clearly want action", "people should get on with" implementing her recommendations and "locally people need to step up to the mark and do the things that have been recommended".
No more enquiries are required. We know what has happened, we know who did it, we know why there was not proper justice for the victims.
The Jay report, which looked only at the problem in Rotherham, estimated there were 1,400 victims from that town alone in the 15 year period it covered. Here’s a few highlights from that report’s Executive Summary:
“Over the first twelve years covered by this Inquiry, the collective failures of political and officer leadership were blatant. From the beginning, there was growing evidence that child sexual exploitation was a serious problem in Rotherham. This came from those working in residential care and from youth workers who knew the young people well.”
“Within social care, the scale and seriousness of the problem was underplayed by senior managers. At an operational level, the Police gave no priority to CSE, regarding many child victims with contempt and failing to act on their abuse as a crime. Further stark evidence came in 2002, 2003 and 2006 with three reports known to the Police and the Council, which could not have been clearer in their description of the situation in Rotherham. The first of these reports was effectively suppressed because some senior officers disbelieved the data it contained. This had led to suggestions of cover up. The other two reports set out the links between child sexual exploitation and drugs, guns and criminality in the Borough. These reports were ignored and no action was taken to deal with the issues that were identified in them.”
“By far the majority of perpetrators were described as 'Asian' by victims, yet throughout the entire period, councillors did not engage directly with the Pakistani-heritage community to discuss how best they could jointly address the issue. Some councillors seemed to think it was a one-off problem, which they hoped would go away. Several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.”
The report contains 14 recommendations, almost all of which are administrative in nature and, it seems, few of which have actually been implemented anyway. Unfortunately it did not include a recommendation which suggested the police listen to the victims, detect and arrest the perpetrators and for the CPS to make sure that whoever they are and wherever they come from, they stand up before the Beak to answer the appropriate charges.
I was listening to Nick Ferrari this morning and one of his callers suggested Mr Farage had used this issue to perpetuate and promote his racist attitudes. The caller felt it was unfair to highlight the fact that the overwhelming majority of perpetrators were of Pakistani origin as they represented a very small proportion of the total population of men of Pakistani heritage. He didn’t mention that those same perpetrators had enjoyed the protection of the industry that promotes the ridiculous multicultural experiment that has led to scandals like this occurring in those country.
> //It's not what you want,//
> How arrogant. Yes it is, I want to ensure people who allowed this to happen are bought to book and there is no chance it happens to my daughters/grandaughters.
It's really not a good look to take a snippet out of a sentence and then say "How arrogant". The whole sentence was "It's not what you want, it's what the victims want that is important." That's in the context of at least 14 years, if not decades, of abuse and a report that took seven years and hasn't been implemented. Different people might want different things, at different priorities, but after all this time and all this inquisition whose people are the most important now? You? That would be the arrogant view. The most important people are the victims, just like in other scandals like the Post Office scandal or the infected blood scandal. People witter and whine and nothing actually gets done.
Starmer and the libtards have shamed us all. It is being discussed all over the World, after we have been prevented from doing so for years, and their opinion woiuld appear to be far right too. Put Starmer in Robinsons cell and release the only man brave enough down the years to challenge their rotten and evil authority.
https:/
@13.11 I know. I have been saying for at least two years that Reform is required. That is why the legacy media and the uniparties have tried to close ranks on the popular movement that is gaining ground anyway. They are terrified of what a truly independent administration will uncover and the consequences to their false lives. Without GB News, Mahyar Tousi, and other brave individuals they would get away with it and feel free to rinse and repeat the deciet. Tousi TV is worth a watch on the Toob.
//They are terrified of what a truly independent administration will uncover and the consequences to their false lives//
After stating the above I though it might be worth mentioning that Starmer has cancelled local elections due in May until, in some cases, 2027! Democracy? Don't make me laugh. Reported and discussed on the main stream legacy "news" channels. Nope. You are supposed to go meekly to your demise.
We need a full enquiry into how these utterly similar group rapes happened in different areas of the country; carried out by men who have only 2 or 3 things in common...
All of the police services, local authorities, childrens' services, etc., in these areas failed in exactly the same way.
If there is not a nationwide inquiry these scandals may be demoted to local abberations only, when it is obvious that where large groups of men (with the same mindset) gather, having been shown that their actions go largely unheeded and unpunished unspeakable offences against vulnerable young girls will continue.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.