There is a disappointing lack of consistency when reviewing answers that have been banned or removed. Particularly when placed in the context of other similar answers or threads.
I have noticed on numerous occasions that a well written (inoffensive), thoughtful reply can disappear if it runs contrary to the popular view expressed, while an antagonistic and / or rude reply often remains.
Some removals (from personal experience) defy logic, and as the AB Ed will not engage in discussions as to the reason for removals, they forever defy explanation.
Some level of consistency please, and how about reinstating some of the contentious (but not offensive) answers to balance the arguments?