Corby If this is his only income his increase on both pensions would have amounted to about �10 per week, about the same as the monthly rise in his council tax.
Therefore the other 3 weeks increases would have had to pay for the increases in essentials like the water rates, gas, electric, food let alone the less essential like house insurance and bus or car expenses. This is what the pensioners are objecting to the erosion each year of the disposable income left after essentials are paid. Plus some pensioners, unlikely in this case, have to pay huge bills to pay for local government sevices, like home help which over the last few years have ceased to be subsidised,
Why the h*** should he have to move to a cheaper property this is the typical reaction of a younger person, he has lived there over 30 years, it suits him, he is probably unlikely to find a cheaper property in which he would be happy and why should he move to pay for bills which are out of control.
One way all local and county councils could save money is by stopping the 'expenses' most councillors claim and go back to the system where you became a councillor out of a sense of public duty not to have a second income