ChatterBank2 mins ago
Paedophilia
If a 17 year old boy has sex with a 15 year old girl is he branded a paedophile? If so would he be branded as such for the rest of his life? Should there be different categories rather than lump all cases together?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by kwicky. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I think he would...
Most countries seem to have a proximity law which would either allow this sort of thing or give a more lenient sentence, but my admittedly quick research turns up nothing for the UK.
In that particular case, I'd say he just has to wait a bit. If he loved her, I don't see why he'd risk court proceedings. Of course, if he didn't actually know her age it'd be a lot more excusable, so for that I'd be in favour of said proximity law.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_i n_Europe#United_Kingdom_.28and_its_Crown_depen dencies.29
Some of this is surprisingly funny.
Most countries seem to have a proximity law which would either allow this sort of thing or give a more lenient sentence, but my admittedly quick research turns up nothing for the UK.
In that particular case, I'd say he just has to wait a bit. If he loved her, I don't see why he'd risk court proceedings. Of course, if he didn't actually know her age it'd be a lot more excusable, so for that I'd be in favour of said proximity law.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_i n_Europe#United_Kingdom_.28and_its_Crown_depen dencies.29
Some of this is surprisingly funny.
The most he could be charged with is statutory rape, as the girl is over 14 (sex with anyone under that age automatically gets 'paedophile' status, but it is acknowledged that people over that age do engage in sexual relationships). Obviously if the sex is within the bounds of a relationship is is more acceptable. Given that there is only a 2 year age difference I doubt the police would be too interested, but people in that situation still need to be discreet because technically it is a crime. Theoretically if he was tried and prosecuted by a zealot then he could be made to sign the sex offenders' register for life - not something you want on your c.v.
Interesting article (and video) here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6162724.stm
"Official government guidance on prosecuting suggests that teenagers who have sex when one of them is below 16 should not necessary be prosecuted."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6162724.stm
"Official government guidance on prosecuting suggests that teenagers who have sex when one of them is below 16 should not necessary be prosecuted."