Donate SIGN UP

Do you want a mosque built on taxpayers money

Avatar Image
Verbourn | 10:01 Tue 03rd Apr 2007 | News
22 Answers
No
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 22rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Verbourn. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I'd rather they built it on a granite bedrock. Safety first.
Do I want proper questions that convey a bit of information and maybe a link?

- YES
Ever get the feeling that you're a character in 'Groundhog Day'???

Hasn't this one been done to death a few weeks back?

sp1814,

Think that one was the biggest mosque and was to be privately financed.
Search under London Mosque Olympic Village for loads of references, like this one:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml =/news/2007/02/18/nmosque18.xml

I have to say I am against the building of this huge Mosque.

BUT anyone who says it is going to be built using taxpayers money is just being plain stupid and trying to stir up trouble without an ounce of data to back it up.

If have searched on a number of sites and most say it is going to be funded with money from Saudi Arabia.

I can find no reference to UK taxpayers money being used.
Maybe Verbourn is Saudi Arabian?
If it's a choice between a Mosque - a spiritual place of worship - and a Trident Submarine, I'd go for a mosque.
But then, I'm not as well informed as all the ant-muslim ABers out there who hold the opinion that the Koran advocates terrorism without actually ever haven read it. It was in the Daily Mail though, so it's true.

So when can we put our application into Arabia to build a cathedral, then? I assume the Mosque building agreement will be reciprocated.
loosehead

That's purely hypothetical. Christians don't worship in the same way that Muslims to. To Muslims, their religion is (well, it seems to me) an integral part of their lives and their identity.

Christians by and large, in this country don't seem as energised by their faith.

They seem to be more energised by Antiques Roadshow.
Verbourn

Where did you read that the mosque was being built with taxpayers' money.

Are you sure about that?

Furthermore, if it is being built with taxpayers' money, and Mulims pay taxes, what point are you trying to rais...

Hang on - I've got it...you're stirring aren't you?

Oh dear...I think that after the discussion on this subject few weeks ago, we can all see through you like gandma's underwear.

Nice try, poorly executed.
The point, SP, is that we are required and expected to be tolerant but the converse is not true. Try and build a church in an islamic state and see how far you get. Why is Islam so unsure of itself that any oppositioin cannot be tolerated? It's ok to ridicule christainity on an almost daily basis but draw a few cartoons and the wrath of Allah is upon the infidel!
Loosehead

You're trying to compare like with unlike.

Islam and Christianity have completely different histories. Completely different origins so today, you cannot compare one with the other.

The way that Muslims worship in this country is entirely different to the way Christians do. In fact, the relationship that Catholics have to their church is completely different to the way that Anglicans worship.

You're proposing something hypothetical. Lets say that if there was a sizeable Christian community in Bhagdad who tried to build a cathedral, what would happen?

Who knows??? You may as well ask, what would happen if Bjork wrote a song with intelligable lyrics.

It's never gonna happen
Loosehead,

You are generalising too much. There are many Islamic countries that have churches and practising christians, even synagogues. There are churches in Iraq - Saddam ran a secular state. Tariq Assis, a practising christian, was even in the government.

Your point is true in a small minority of countries. Saudi Arabia practice Wahabbism, which is a particularly intolerant version of Islam and you can go to prison just for possessing a bible. Wahabbism isn't widespread, and you would be able to practice your christian faith in most Islamic countries.
Ok but why is their position so sensitive to debate or even the slightest dissent, I just don't get it. If someone challenges my view on something I do my best to back it up with a coherant case. Why is Islam incapable of that?
The trouble with Christian is that they all eat fish on a friday.
Loosehead has given the single most predictable - and stupid - answer that regularly appears on here. Whenever we speak about muslims wearing veils, building mosques etc... some 'Loosehead' pops up and says 'imagine if we tried doing it there! Imagine if we tried building a church in Saudi Arabia! Imagine if I wore a bikini in Saudi Arabia!'

If you think you're making a point, you're not. You're just lazily avoiding the question, and being really, really dumb.



The Muslims already own the land, all they are doing is waiting for planning permission to be approved, then, as has been said, its being financed from Saudi Arabia.

I have no problem with a Mosque being built there, my problem is its size, why on earth does it have to be so big.
Why are you not campaigning fo the building of a cathedral in this country if you are that bothered?
How big is going to be?

Are we talking St Paul's Cathedral big or Wembley Stadium big, or somewhere in the middle?

Has anyone got a comparison building in terms of size?
This is the size of the proposed Mosque, and as a matter of interest, London already has more Mosques than anywhere else in Britain.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml? xml=/opinion/2006/09/25/do2502.xml

1 to 20 of 22rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Do you want a mosque built on taxpayers money

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.