A special topic heading for Maddie?

[anotheoldgit]

Judging by the amount of Maddie questions on the news topic site, should the AB editior consider creating a special Maddie headed topic site?

[MrBen5]

Hmmm, not really as it will be over with in a couple of weeks, now that the English authorities are involved.
Maybe at the time it would have been a good idea, but i think its a little late now...

[boojp]

I don't think it's a great idea, as it could potentially become a discussion board for the McCann critics to make irrelevant and pointless comments about their behaviour and so on.

[Maggoty]

Or for their supporters to bemoan the fact that people think it was wrong of the McCanns to leave the 3 kids on their own - when after all its the done thing. Isn't it!

[China Doll]

I support the idea.

I'm rather sick of the threads clogging up news with the stupid speculation and the rather sick thigh rubbing element that comes with each 'new development.'

Some people should be ashamed of themselves.

[boojp]

That is exactly right China Doll. I couldn't agree more. However, don't you think a Maddy section would facilitate even more stupid speculation and thigh rubbing?

[monkeyeyes]

I agree with China.

The only hard fact in this case is that a little girl has disappeared.

Everything else is either speculation, salivation or judgemental.

[China Doll]

It's not going to stop.

So frankly I'd just rather not have to see it.

I've been inches away from resorting to personal insults on here and calling some people ghouls.

But I like the moral high ground too much ;0)

[boojp]

I suppose people are going to clog up the News bit anyway with their silly speculative comments, so maybe you're right-it probably is best just to have the Maddy section, at least it will help to clear out the News segment.

[boojp]

I got my knuckles wrapped yesterday for resorting to the very same thing-I called them sick and they had a go at me!!!

[laurence2]

boojp.

You say that you got your knuckles wrapped yesterday {i assume that you mean me as no one else posted afterwards}, yet you addmitted that you was ''WRONG'' to say the thread was ''SICK''.

Me thinks a little two face from you maybe?

[boojp]

It is the truth, I did get my knuckles wrapped.

[laurence2]

By me?

or someone else

[boojp]

A couple of people. Although I did not mean to use the word 'sick' I still believe that the article was created for the wrong reasons, as I explained. It was in bad taste. I I don't want to get into that again. We just think that perhaps a separate Madeleine section should be created.

[Maggoty]

At lesst that way it the subject can be avoided if neadby!!

[China Doll]

I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that NJOK created that link precisely to highlight the bad taste you mentioned boojp.

I don't wish to be argumentative but I would guess he actually feels the same way you do.

Obviously taste is entirely subjective and you should keep your opinion either way.

[boojp]

Keep my opinion? Thanks China Doll, thought we were on the same page but obviously I was wrong! Seems I can't please anyone!

[B00]

boojp- CD was saying that you are entitled to your opinion, whatever it may be. She certainly wasn't getting at you.


I don't think

[Neilzulu1]

Lets just wait for truth to come out please.

[China Doll]

Spot on Boobies.

I think NJOK was making a point. I'm pretty much 99% on it.

Merely stated that as wouldn't want his good name getting tarnished!

[anotheoldgit]

Although AB likes to post questions for us to answer, it seems obvious judging from my question that they are not prepared to equally contribute, an give answers to ABer's questions.