Donate SIGN UP

Manchester C- charge

Avatar Image
SKA | 11:12 Fri 26th Oct 2007 | News
23 Answers
Are they really going to introduce it here? I really hate the idea of it!! There's no need!!
Whose idea was this anyway? I want to scream and shout at them!!
In London that understandable, but this is dumb. I live near the city centre(ish) we won't be able to drive across Manchester because some fool decided it would be a good idea!!
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 23rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by SKA. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
There are too many cars. Get on a tram to cross the city centre, it might even be quicker.
Question Author
I'm from the south and trams dont come down here
Pity, and all those hundreds of buses that go into the city centre are all smelly and full of odd people.
Question Author
LOL, your telling me. Not that I mind taking the bus I do normally - I just dont want it the c- charge where I live!!
Fewer cars will improve your immediate living environment.
Question Author
yeah right, good excuse though
And the money raised is going towards the tram link south.
if you live in the zone you'll presumably get a hefty discount. In London all the Chelsea tractor owners are now in the zone and can trundle round London all day for 80p, rather defeating the object of the exercise imho.
-- answer removed --
10ClarionSt

And more dead and maimed children.

They put all the junk in the road because idiots do not obey the speed limit.
I think it depends on the ok from outlying councils Ska. I live in Trafford and the council here has said no, I think Stockport then followed suit. Without complete agreement they can't go ahead, it just wouldn't work, think of the ring road for a start! I think you'll be safe, and I hope they get the trams down to you soon, they're a blessing round here.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
roundabouts stop traffic too. That's the point: you have traffic coming from two directions, one of them has to stop. But as for making traffic move faster by widening roads - well, the experience of the M25 suggests the opposite. Build new traffic routes and people will rush out to buy a car in order to use them; there is more traffic than ever before, and just as slow. Traffic volumes aren't static. I read somewhere that there are now twice as many vehicles in London as there were 20 years ago - a startling thought when you realise the population is pretty much the same.
Has anyone ever seen a councillor on a bus? They dont use buses - and why would they when they get free parking ? They will of course be exempt from the congestion charge, and even if they were not exempt, they would be able to claim it back on expenses. In principal I
would not mind using public transport. but on the few occcasions I have had to use it , I have had to sit on a filthy bus, listening to people effing and jeffing usually very loudly into mobile phones. And yes, there do seem to be some very odd people who use buses. I do not feel safe
even in daylight.
10ClarionSt

Provide you with free public transport? Why? And when you say 'free' I assume you mean at council tax payers expense. So you want to rob little old ladies who pay council tax so that you can travel for nothing?

And I am as pi55ed off as you are about humps and narrowing Streets and poxy signs. They cost a absolute fortune just to make people do what they are supposed to do by law.

And the fine line between an injury and a fatality is speed. Hit a child at 20mph and it will survive. Hit a child at 35 mph and it will be badly injured or die. That is not me taking an extreme case, it is an undisputed fact.

Drivers under the influnence do tend to injure themselves and their passengers, but most deaths of pedestrians are caused by cars travelling at excessive speeds, usually in urban areas.
I was in London t'other day and saw Mayor Ken on the tube, Sambro. Does that answer your question?
jno I suppose if I lived in London i would also use the tube. I thought this thread was about Greater Manchester which does not have the presumably excellent public transport that you enjoy. Keep your knickers on!
-- answer removed --
drivers aren't the only ratepayers, Clarion. Pedestrians, parents, clean-air fetishists and others are also permitted to have their say. As I understand London's scheme, it can not be used to make money; all proceeds must go back into improving London's transport. Bendy buses and suchlike.

1 to 20 of 23rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Manchester C- charge

Answer Question >>