ChatterBank1 min ago
�2,200.00 for the taking of a life?
20 Answers
Less than half of the value of his bike the man was fined for killing a teenager by yelling at her to get out of the way and then running into her deliberately when she didn't move fast enough.
And a judge says he can't send the b*****d to prison because there is no 'legislation in place'! What does that mean, for Heaven's sake? He killed the girl. It was not pre-meditated murder but it was CERTAINLY manslaughter and for manslaughter he should have got a prison sentence!
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND!
And a judge says he can't send the b*****d to prison because there is no 'legislation in place'! What does that mean, for Heaven's sake? He killed the girl. It was not pre-meditated murder but it was CERTAINLY manslaughter and for manslaughter he should have got a prison sentence!
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by juliacornwal. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.This is discussed a couple of posts down:
http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question59 3016.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/ herts/7496757.stm
http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question59 3016.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/ herts/7496757.stm
That's because you don't have the whole picture.
According to the evidence at the trial she stepped out of the road and onto the pavement and then stepped back in front of him at the last moment - presumably some silly game of chicken or the like.
That's why the CPS didn't feel they had enough evidence for a manslaughter charge.
I dare say you just read the "edited highlights" somewhere probably designed to make you angry?
According to the evidence at the trial she stepped out of the road and onto the pavement and then stepped back in front of him at the last moment - presumably some silly game of chicken or the like.
That's why the CPS didn't feel they had enough evidence for a manslaughter charge.
I dare say you just read the "edited highlights" somewhere probably designed to make you angry?
'presumably some game of chicken'? Maybe she was alarmed at the speed with which the bike was coming towards her? And I've read the wwws. below but I still don't think he was suitably punished for what he did. The bike cost twice as much as the fine - so he can't be exactly hard up, and the girl died.
Perhaps, then, if this was no more than 'a tragic accident' they should change the rules of time trials and hold them in places where there are no pedestrians.
I'm sorry, but to me it was inappropriate and made a mockery of the girl's life and her parents love for her!
Perhaps, then, if this was no more than 'a tragic accident' they should change the rules of time trials and hold them in places where there are no pedestrians.
I'm sorry, but to me it was inappropriate and made a mockery of the girl's life and her parents love for her!
The mother is entitled to say what ever she wants - I don't even think that she was there.
The quote that I gave comes from this article. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/ herts/7496370.stm
It is not as clear cut as you would like to think it is. It appears that there are different accounts about where he was cycling.
Still, I am sure you know best, having been in the court and listened to all the testimonies.
The quote that I gave comes from this article. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/ herts/7496370.stm
It is not as clear cut as you would like to think it is. It appears that there are different accounts about where he was cycling.
Still, I am sure you know best, having been in the court and listened to all the testimonies.
She'd also been drinking at the skatepark.
Which is often a haunt of underage drinkers
(I live 2 miles outside Buckingham - as oppose to 15 miles "down the road" in Milton Keynes)
and there was CCTV evidence so I'd imagine that the CPS had a good hard look at the facts and evidence and decided that a manslaughter charge would not stick.
I really don't see what relevance the value of his bike was - he certainly wasn't rich living in Western Avenue
Which is often a haunt of underage drinkers
(I live 2 miles outside Buckingham - as oppose to 15 miles "down the road" in Milton Keynes)
and there was CCTV evidence so I'd imagine that the CPS had a good hard look at the facts and evidence and decided that a manslaughter charge would not stick.
I really don't see what relevance the value of his bike was - he certainly wasn't rich living in Western Avenue
She deliberately stepped in front of the cycle which was on the road. The (underage) girl had been drinking cans Stella in a nearby park which may have accounted for her dangerous behaviour. The cyclist was reckless by assuming she was sober and would have the sense to get back on the pavement.
There was CCTV film of the incident, and based on this, a charge of dangerous cycling (for which there cannot be a jail term) was layed rather than a charge for manslaughter.
Pedestrian deaths in the UK: (1998-2005):
Death involving motor vehicles 6312
Death involving cyclists 22
Can you spot where your indignation should be aimed?
There was CCTV film of the incident, and based on this, a charge of dangerous cycling (for which there cannot be a jail term) was layed rather than a charge for manslaughter.
Pedestrian deaths in the UK: (1998-2005):
Death involving motor vehicles 6312
Death involving cyclists 22
Can you spot where your indignation should be aimed?
I think the council here have done a similar thing to where we live, mixed roads, cycling freindly paths and pedestrian pavements all together without any clear warning, if you look at where this happened it was on a bit of pavement which was connecting a road with a cycle path, I would like to think, he shouted get out of the way because he knew he was going fast and to stop suddenly would have been dangerous to him, usually if someone shouts get out of the way, the norm would be to do this, I think it was a tragic situation & a dilemma that if he came across again would think about. When someone is hit by a golf ball and killed and the bloke didn't shout "fore" is that manslaughter?
-- answer removed --