Donate SIGN UP

Bye Bye acre

Avatar Image
jake-the-peg | 11:52 Mon 21st Jul 2008 | News
26 Answers
Can anyone come up with a good reason for keeping the acre?

At 4,840 square yards (be honest did you actually know that) it isn't even a square number!

Shouldn't we welcome this EU directive with open arms?
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 26 of 26rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by jake-the-peg. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Jake, here in Oz we have had the metric system since the 60`s but the acre is still widely used, unofficially of course, when the question is asked "How big is your house block"? 9 out of 10 people will say third of an acre, half an acre or a couple of acres and so on. Its probably the one bit of the old country we still hang on to.
buildersmate

Is that right?

220 yds x 220 yds = 48,400 sq. yds

And we have already established an Acre is 4840 sq. yds.
-- answer removed --
What about the poor old farmer who got kicked in the balls - he had 2 acres
Oops, Gromit, it's 220 x 22, and not square. Something to do with the lengths for ploughing, as others have pointed out. Sorry.
sp1814, it is London that smells funny, not everything outside.

I can visualise litres, metres and kilometres, but start quoting lengths in centimetres and I have no chance. Good old feet and inches are the only way to do small measurements.

21 to 26 of 26rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Bye Bye acre

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.