Donate SIGN UP

How serious is their crime?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 16:44 Sat 20th Sep 2008 | News
20 Answers
Have this Teacher & his Brother, committed anything more serious than many ABers also do on a regular basis during their works time?

Or is the real reason, because they are members of the BNP.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/wear/762705 5.stm
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 20rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
You've missed the point. However bad it may be for a teacher to have strong BNP views, the fact was he was posting this during work time. Teachers have a responsibility at work and do not have spare time to write their own posts on forums.
how can a teacher be appointed to enforce school rules when he's breaking them himself?
I have never heard of "Solidarity", to be honest I thought the BNP were strongly against unions, nowt wrong there I guess.

But if the affiliations are strong perhaps the real problem lies with him not declaring he is a member. Yes, it is a ducking witch scenario because if he had admitted it he would be sacked anyway, but they are the rules.

I do not even work in state education yet have to declare all my memberships etc to the committee and the Head Master And the last time I looked we don't have any pesky muslims at my school.

A few Hindus and some Jews who are very intelligent and well bred boys.
Sacked for using facebook:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/connected/main.jhtm l?xml=/connected/2007/11/12/dlfacebook112.xml

Sacked for using eBay

http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/stuart_kin g/2007/09/sacked-for-using-ebay-what-a-w.html

Sacked for booking a holiday:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/370462.stm

All sacked for using the internet for personal reasons during working hours.

So no, I don't think the reason is because he is a member of BNP.
My guess is that most normal people would feel uneasy about having someone with white supremacist tendencies teaching their little 'uns.

I don't think that you can ban the BNP as a political party, but as a society, I think it's important to keep them as far away from kids as possible.

Like paedophiles really.
I do hope he is being struck off for being a member of the BNP.

It would be nice to think that the educational authorities were strong and confident enought to say having teachers expressing support for openly racist organisations is unacceptable.

Frankly I think there's a more than passing case to have them banned as a proscribed organisation.

Alas it seems free speech still involves the right to spew hatred ( on many racial fronts ).

Oh well with a bit of luck any other similarly minded ( if you can use that word) teachers should at least get the hint.

Can we sack those couple of creationists while we're at it too please
I have no problem with anyone who holds extreme political or religious views teaching in state schools - just as long as they keep those views out of the classroom, and just as long as they're not indulging in expressing them when they're supposed to be teaching the kids.

I hope he never teaches again.
Question Author
saxy-jag

I have no problem with anyone who holds extreme political or religious views teaching in state schools

You shound very much like some of these racist apologists, i.e. "some of my best friends are Black, but".

I hope he never teaches again.











Question Author
sp1814

Can you not get homosexual paedophiles also?

If so, should we keep these as far away from kids as possible also?
No, you cannot get 'homosexual paedophiles'.

Homosexuals are attracted to adults of their own sex.

Paedophiles are attracted to pre-pubescent children- some are attracted to boys, some girls and some both.
googling i think that you can in fact have them ethel
Question Author
The very fact that they are attracted to persons of their own sex makes them homosexuals Ethel, no matter what age the person is.

It just means that if their victims happen to be below the legal age of consent, they are also paedophiles.
Presumably you'd be sticking up for these teachers if they were posting extreme Islamist political material too?
He criticicsed Islam, a sacking offence in it's own right! How dare a teacher criticicse the religion of peace!
I don't think that you can ban the BNP as a political party, but as a society, I think it's important to keep them as far away from kids as possible.

Like paedophiles really.


Like Darkies really.
anotheoldgit

Interesting question. I've been thinking about it and I think technically, Ethel is correct (quelle surprise - I'm disagreeing with you yet again.)

A homosexual is attracted to members of their own sex. A homosexual who is attracted to minors of his or her own sex is a paedophile.

You can't be both things at the same time.

Another example is (say) a bisexual woman. If she dates a fella, then a woman, then another fella...she's not straight, then a lesbian, then straight again. Her core being is bisexual.

(Actually, I don't believe in bisexuality...I think it's just people being greedy and having no manners).
anotheoldgit, I will never agree with you about that.

You are a heterosexual, yet you are never attracted to little girls because you are not a paedophile.

Paedophiles are not attracted to fully developed adults, so cannot be homosexual or heterosexual.
Question Author
sp1814 & Ethel

I think we must agree to disagree on this one.

But before we do, one last shot.

Homosexual : Of, relating to, or having a sexual orientation to persons of the same sex.

There is no mention of the legal age, so doesn't it follow that a homosexual is more likely to be attracted not only to adult males but also to young Boys? When this threshold has been crossed he becomes a paedophile also.

There was no such thing as a paedophile in ancient Greece, but homosexuality was rife, no young boy was safe.
If a man fancies women, he's heterosexual.
If a man fancies men, he's homosexual.
If a man fancies children, he's a paedophile.
If a man fancies animals, he's bestial.

If someone was into bestiality, AOG, would you check the sex of the Labrador and then pronounce them heterosexually bestial or homosexually bestial?

Or would you just say they were into bestiality?
As Phoebe once sung in 'Friends'

Sometimes men love women,
Sometimes men love men,
And then there are bisexuals,
Though some just say they're kidding themselves,
La lalala lalalalala la

1 to 20 of 20rss feed

Do you know the answer?

How serious is their crime?

Answer Question >>