Another solicitor letter

[jaycee401]

I have received another letter from ex's solicitor (again via the solicitor who acted for me during this dispute) this solicitor has been told twice by the sol acting for me that they are no longer taking instructions from myself, but he keeps writing to them.
This letter now says that he finds the adjudicators findings 'consitute a res judicata between the parties'. This sol then says 'I refer you to Phipson on Evidence 16th Ed Para 44-31', and that I cannot deny the agreement to pay his client �x and for me to walk away from this without having to pay the money would tantamount to unjust enrichment by my failure to keep my part of the bargaib. Refer doctrine part of Pallant v Morgan.
I can honestly say there was never any agreement between me and the ex for me to pay him �x. If there had of been I would not have just spend �15k fighting this in a land reg tribunal. He now gives me seven days to consider these references but no longer! Thats how the letter ends. Any advice would be greatfully appreciated. thanks. do i have to reply to this letter

[cassa333]

go to another solicitor and ask them what it means.

[buildersmate]

This is one for the 'real' legal experts on here, Jaycee. It might help them if you can post the original set of your Q & As up here (as links - if you can find them - I know there's lots of history to this).