ChatterBank1 min ago
Is there an answer to the ever growing social underclass.
Highlighted recently by the Mathews case, what can be done about the whole swathe of society that have developed into a parasitical layer, an underclass, contributing nothing and living on an ever more generous benefits system. How can we get people away from the idea that you can make a career out of having children. What is the answer to the section of society that's only ambition is the aquisition of a life funded by the hard working tax payer? Where they have no aspirations for themselves and where their own children are largeky the tools by which the extract money from the state to maintain the standard lifestyle of fast food, fags and Booze. Is there no system where by this behaviour can be deterred? This is not a poitical rant but a real cross party issue. I think it's a problem that would take a generation to solve not a parliament of one colour or the other.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by R1Geezer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.R1Geezer I sort of see where your going with the giving them the bare minimum. the problem is that if you have this 2 tiered society (and they really will be the underclass then!)
then the bottom tier is going to want what the top tier have.
they can do that in 2 ways
1 work hard - we can already dismiss that or we wouldnt be having this conversation
2 -steal from the rich.
The answer is to definitley not take money away from them because it would cost more in the long run. Maybe there needs to be more encouragement it schools ie if it looks like they aint gonna make it academically then push them towards trades or the armed forces. Show them they can have a good life in work that may not need a lot of brain power but at least can provide them a decent standard of living.
then the bottom tier is going to want what the top tier have.
they can do that in 2 ways
1 work hard - we can already dismiss that or we wouldnt be having this conversation
2 -steal from the rich.
The answer is to definitley not take money away from them because it would cost more in the long run. Maybe there needs to be more encouragement it schools ie if it looks like they aint gonna make it academically then push them towards trades or the armed forces. Show them they can have a good life in work that may not need a lot of brain power but at least can provide them a decent standard of living.
-- answer removed --
Whilst recently spending a 3 months' assignment in the USA, having completed my fourth Lecture at Havard University, I petitioned around one hundred and eighty students on their views concerning social welfare. I boasted the fact (or is it a "fact" ?) that social welfare in the United Kingdom far outweighs anything else worldwide, including that which exists throughout France, notwithstanding the National Health Service, Education and Public Transport.
My claim was refuted.
The response from my students (who were drawn chiefly from the United States and Canada) was that "any attempt at a welfare state on the lines adopted in Britain was always open to abuse and would be deemed to be a failure, leading to complete dependency on the part of every man, woman and child".
My claim was refuted.
The response from my students (who were drawn chiefly from the United States and Canada) was that "any attempt at a welfare state on the lines adopted in Britain was always open to abuse and would be deemed to be a failure, leading to complete dependency on the part of every man, woman and child".
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.